Subscribe
Issue No.05 - Sept.-Oct. (2012 vol.14)
pp: 47-52
Edward M. Stroz , Stroz Friedberg, LLC
D. Frank Hsu , Fordham University
ABSTRACT
A deeper connection between the field of informatics and the justice system could empower lawyers and judges as they explore documentary evidence with enhanced knowledge-discovery tools and techniques.
INDEX TERMS
Informatics, Information technology, Forensics, Knowledge discovery, Computational modeling, Legal aspects, law, justice informatics, information technology
CITATION
Edward M. Stroz, D. Frank Hsu, "Justice Informatics: Improving Knowledge Discovery for the Justice System", IT Professional, vol.14, no. 5, pp. 47-52, Sept.-Oct. 2012, doi:10.1109/MITP.2012.22
REFERENCES
1. D.F. Hsu, B.S. Kristal, and C. Schweikert, “Rank-Score Characteristic (RSC) Functions and Cognitive Diversity,” Proc. 2010 Int'l Conf. Brain Informatics (BI 10), Springer, 2010, pp. 42–54.
2. T. Hey et al., eds., “Jim Gray on eScience: A Transformed Scientific Method,” Fourth Paradigm, Microsoft Research, 2009, pp. 17–31.
3. “Cloud Computing's Growing Pains—Break-ins and Breakdowns,” The Economist, vol. 399, no. 8731, 2011, p. 14.
4. S. Liu, “Enabling Electronic Healthcare Information Exchange,” IT Professional, vol. 9, no. 6, 2007, pp. 17–23.
5. “Electronic Discovery in the New York State Courts,” The New York State Unified Court System, Feb. 2009; www.courts.state.ny.us/courts/comdiv/PDFs E-DiscoveryReport.pdf.
6. R. Maura and G.V. Cormack, “Technology-Assisted Review in E-Discovery Can Be More Effective and More Efficient than Exhaustive Manual,” Richmond J. Law and Technology, vol. XVII, no. 3, 2011, article 11; http://jolt.richmond.edu/v17i3article11.pdf .