The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Subscribe
Issue No.05 - Sept.-Oct. (2012 vol.14)
pp: 40-46
Simon Wing , The Johns Hopkins University
ABSTRACT
Adverse space weather can pose high risks to mobile and wireless communications. Space weather forecasts can help manage the risks. This article presents three space weather forecast models that satisfy different user needs and operational constraints.
INDEX TERMS
Satellites, Meteorology, Magnetosphere, Wireless communication, Atmospheric modeling, Satellite broadcasting, Predictive models, risk-management, space weather, mobile, wireless, communication, Kp, Kp forecast, magnetic storm
CITATION
Simon Wing, "Mobile and Wireless Communication: Space Weather Threats, Forecasts, and Risk Management", IT Professional, vol.14, no. 5, pp. 40-46, Sept.-Oct. 2012, doi:10.1109/MITP.2012.69
REFERENCES
1. The National Space Weather Program Strategic Plan, FCM-P30-1995, Washington D.C., 1995.
2. M. Messerotti, “TSRS as a Solar Radio Noise Monitor for Communication and Navigation Systems,” Earth Moon Planet, vol. 104, 2009, pp. 51–54; doi:10.1007/s11038-008-9265-8.
3. L. Lanzerotti et al., “Noise in Wireless Systems from Solar Radio Bursts,” Advances in Space Research, vol. 36, 2005, pp. 2253–2257; doi:10.1016/j.asr.2004.04.013.
4. S. Wing et al., “Solar Wind Driving of Dayside Field - Aligned Currents,” J. Geophysics Research, vol. 116, A08208, 2011; doi:10.1029/2011JA016579.
5. S. Wing and D.G. Sibeck, “The Effects of Interplanetary Magnetic Field Z-Component and the Solar Wind Dynamic Pressure on the Magnetospheric Magnetic Field Line,” J. Geophysics Research, vol. 102, 1997, pp. 7207–7216.
6. J. Bartels, “The Standardized Index, Ks, and the Planetary Index, Kp,” IATME Bull. 12b, Int'l Union of Geodetic and Geophysics, 1949, p. 97.
7. N.A. Tsyganenko, “A Magnetospheric Magnetic Field Model with a Warped Tail Current Sheet,” Planetary and Space Science, vol. 37, 1989, pp. 5–20.
8. A.E. Hedin, “MSIS-86 Thermospheric Model,” J. Geophysics Research, vol. 92, 1987, pp. 4649–4662.
9. M.-C. Fok, T.E. Moore, and W.N. Spjeldvik, “Rapid Enhancement of Radiation Belt Electron Fluxes due to Substorm Dipolarization of the Geomagnetic Field,” J. Geophysics Research, vol. 106, 2001, pp. 3873–3881.
10. D.A. Hardy, “Statistical and Functional Representations of the Pattern of Auroral Energy Flux, Number Flux, and Conductivity,” J. Geophysics Research, vol. 92, 1987, pp. 12275–12294.
11. P.T. Newell et al., “OVATION: Oval Variation, Assessment, Tracking, Intensity, and Online Nowcasting,” Annals Geophysics, vol. 20, 2002, pp. 1039–1047.
12. K. Takahashi, B.A. Toth, and J.V. Olson, “An Automated Procedure for Near-Real-Time Kp Estimates,” J. Geophysics Research, vol. 106, 2001, pp. 21,017–21,032.
13. T. Detman and J.A. Joselyn, “Real-Time Kp Predictions from ACE Real Time Solar Wind,” Solar Wind Nine, S.R. Habbal et al., eds., 1999, pp. 729–732.
14. J.R. Johnson, and S. Wing, “A Solar Cycle Dependence of Nonlinearity in Magnetospheric Activity,” J. Geophysics Research, vol. 110, A04211, 2005; doi:10.1029/2004JA010638.
15. S. Wing et al., “Kp Forecast Models,” J. Geophysics Research, vol. 110, A04203, 2005; doi:10.1029/2004JA10500.
16. P.T. Newell et al., “The Auroral Oval Position, Structure and Intensity of Precipitation from 1984 Onwards: An Automated On-line Data Base,” J. Geophysics Research, vol. 96, 1991, pp. 5877–5882.
17. S. Wing et al., “Neural Networks for Automated Classification of Ionospheric Irregularities from HF Radar Backscattered Signals,” Radio Science, vol. 38, no. 4, 2003, p. 1063; doi:10.1029/2003RS002869.
40 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool