The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Issue No.03 - May-June (2012 vol.14)
pp: 36-42
Lynn McCreedy , US National Library of Medicine
Chris J. Lu , US National Library of Medicine
Allen C. Browne , US National Library of Medicine
Medical language processing seeks to analyze linguistic patterns in electronic medical records, which requires managing lexical variations. A systematic approach to generating derivational variants, including prefixes, suffixes, and zero derivations, has improved precision and recall rates.
natural language Processing (NLP), medical language processing (MLP), lexical tools, derivational variants generation
Lynn McCreedy, Chris J. Lu, Allen C. Browne, "A Systematic Approach for Medical Language Processing: Generating Derivational Variants", IT Professional, vol.14, no. 3, pp. 36-42, May-June 2012, doi:10.1109/MITP.2012.29
1. M.G. Pacak, L.M. Norton, and G.S. Dunham, “Morphosemantic Analysis of -ITIS Forms in Medical Language,” J. Methods of Information in Medicine, vol. 19, no. 2, 1980, pp. 99–105.
2. S. Wolff, “Automatic Coding of Medical Vocabulary,” Medical Information Processing—Computer Management of Narrative Data, Addison Wesley, 1987, pp. 145–162.
3. A.T. McCray et al., “UMLS Knowledge for Biomedical Language Processing,” Bull. Medical Library Assoc., vol. 81, no. 2, 1993, pp. 184–194.
4. A.T. McCray,S. Srinivasan, and A.C. Browne, “Lexical Methods for Managing Variation in Biomedical Terminologies,” Proc. 18th Ann. Symp. Computer Applications in Medical Care, Am. Medical Informatics Assoc., 1994, pp. 235–239.
5. “Derivational Prefix List,” Lexical Tools 2012, Nov. 2011; lvg/2012/docs/designDoc/UDF/derivations prefixList.html.
6. “Derivational Suffix Rules,” Lexical Tools 2012, Oct. 2011; lvg/2012/docs/designDoc/UDF/derivations suffixRules.html.
7. A.V. Aho, J.D. Ullman, J.E. Hopcroft, Data Structure and Algorithms, Addison Wesley, 1983, pp. 163–169.
48 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool