|
| This Article | ||
| ||
| Share | ||
| Bibliographic References | ||
| Add to: | ||
| | ||
| Search | ||
| ||
| ASCII Text | x | ||
| Linda Wilbanks, "Performance Reviews," IT Professional, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 58-60, Jan.-Feb., 2011. | |||
| BibTex | x | ||
| @article{ 10.1109/MITP.2011.13, author = {Linda Wilbanks}, title = {Performance Reviews}, journal ={IT Professional}, volume = {13}, number = {1}, issn = {1520-9202}, year = {2011}, pages = {58-60}, doi = {http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/MITP.2011.13}, publisher = {IEEE Computer Society}, address = {Los Alamitos, CA, USA}, } | |||
| RefWorks Procite/RefMan/Endnote | x | ||
| TY - MGZN JO - IT Professional TI - Performance Reviews IS - 1 SN - 1520-9202 SP58 EP60 EPD - 58-60 A1 - Linda Wilbanks, PY - 2011 KW - Performance reviews KW - managers KW - assessments KW - information technology VL - 13 JA - IT Professional ER - | |||
DOI Bookmark: http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/MITP.2011.13
One of the worst aspects of a manger's job is writing performance reviews. It's easy to review the top performers—just tell them they're great and give them their well-deserved bonuses. But what about the middle performers or those who need improvement? How does an effective manager write and discuss a review that will encourage improvement? And how do employees write an assessment that will maximize their bonus?
Index Terms:
Performance reviews, managers, assessments, information technology
Citation:
Linda Wilbanks, "Performance Reviews," IT Professional, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 58-60, Jan.-Feb. 2011, doi:10.1109/MITP.2011.13
Usage of this product signifies your acceptance of the Terms of Use.

