The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Issue No.01 - Jan.-Feb. (2011 vol.13)
pp: 48-53
Aruna Prem Bianzino , Telecom ParisTech
Anand Raju , Telecom ParisTech
Dario Rossi , Telecom ParisTech
This evaluation of end-user PCs browsing the Web—and loading Flash plug-ins—measures power consumption by considering the hardware platform, operating system, browser, and website. It also reveals the unnecessary power expenditures of tabbed browsing.
Information technology, Internet/Web, green IT
Aruna Prem Bianzino, Anand Raju, Dario Rossi, "Greening the Internet: Measuring Web Power Consumption", IT Professional, vol.13, no. 1, pp. 48-53, Jan.-Feb. 2011, doi:10.1109/MITP.2010.122
1. "Flash Player Version Penetration," Adobe, Sept. 2010, version_penetration.html.
2. "Comparing Embedded Live Stream Options," Univ. of Wisconsin, liveflash_winmedia.html.
3. J. Ozer, "Flash Player: CPU Hog or Hot Tamale? It Depends," Streaming Learning Center, 26 Feb. 2010, flash-player-cpu-hog-or-hot-tamale-it-depends-.html .
4. R. Hansen, "Browser Power Consumption," SecTheory, 1 Dec. 2008, www.sectheory.combrowser-power-consumption.htm .
5. J. Walton, "Browser Face-Off: Battery Life Explored," AnandTech, 11 Sept. 2009,
6. X. Fan, W.-D. Weber, and L.A. Barroso, "Power Provisioning for a Warehouse-Sized Computer," Proc. 34th Ann. ACM Int'l Symp. Computer Architecture (ISCA 07), ACM Press, 2007, pp. 13–23.
7. J. Baliga et al., "Energy Consumption in Optical IP Networks," J. Lightwave Technology, July 2009, pp. 2391–2403.
8. M. Perkins, "CPU Performance Test Results: Flash Player vs. HTML5," blog, 10 Mar. 2010, 03cpu_performance_test_results_f.html .
9. "Cisco Visual Networking Index: Forecast and Methodology, 2008–2013," white paper, Cisco, June 2010, ns341/ns525/ns537/ns705/ns827white_paper_c11-481360_ns827_Networking_Solutions_White_Paper.html .
469 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool