This Article 
 Bibliographic References 
 Add to: 
Nexialism and the Law of Unintended Consequences
July/August 2010 (vol. 12 no. 4)
pp. 58-61
Phil Laplante, Penn State

What do broken windows, merit systems, and cattle prods have to do with new processes and compliance rules? Can the laws of unintended consequences be used as an advantage? Find out as this nexialist explores the interconnectedness of things.

1. H. Rittel and M. Webber, "Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning," Policy Sciences, vol. 4, 1973, pp. 155–169.
2. B. Fr édéric, That Which is Seen and Unseen, self-published pamphlet, 1850;,_and_That_Which_Is_Not_Seen .
3. M. Matza, C.R. McCoy, and M. Fazlollah, "Pressure Builds on City Police for Accuracy," Philadelphia Inquirer,15 Nov. 1998; html111598.asp.
4. T. Grandin and C. Johnson, Animals in Translation, Simon and Shuster, 2005.

Index Terms:
Information technology, nexialism, compliance
Phil Laplante, "Nexialism and the Law of Unintended Consequences," IT Professional, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 58-61, July-Aug. 2010, doi:10.1109/MITP.2010.114
Usage of this product signifies your acceptance of the Terms of Use.