The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Subscribe
Issue No.06 - Nov.-Dec. (2013 vol.17)
pp: 84-87
David Meyer , Brocade Communications
ABSTRACT
Software-defined networking (SDN) promises to bring radical improvements in both cost and functionality to the networking field. At the same time, SDN poses many fundamental questions, including deep architectural issues such as whether control should be centralized or distributed, and whether control and data planes should be separated or share fate. The Software Defined Networking Research Group has been formed to facilitate research into these and other foundational questions.
INDEX TERMS
Software engineering, Research and development,OpenFlow, software defined networking, complexity
CITATION
David Meyer, "The Software-Defined-Networking Research Group", IEEE Internet Computing, vol.17, no. 6, pp. 84-87, Nov.-Dec. 2013, doi:10.1109/MIC.2013.122
REFERENCES
1. OpenFlow Switch Specification, Version 1.3.2 (Wire Protocol 0x04), Open Networking Foundation, 25 Apr. 2013; www.opennetworking.org/images/stories/downloads/ sdn-resources/onf-specifications/ openflowopenflow-spec-v1.3.2.pdf.
2. D. Levin et al., “Logically Centralized? State Distribution Trade-Offs in Software Defined Networks,” Proc. 1st Workshop on Hot Topics in Software-Defined Networks (HotSDN 12), ACM, 2012, pp. 1-6; http://conferences.sigcomm.org/sigcomm/2012/ paper/hotsdnp1.pdf.
3. A Border Gateway Protocol 4 (BGP-4), IETF RFC 4271, Jan. 2006; http://tools.ietf.org/htmlrfc4271.
4. M.E. Csete and J.C. Doyle, “Reverse Engineering of Biological Complexity,” Science, vol. 295, no. 5560, 2002, pp. 1664-1669; doi: 10.1126/science.1069981.
78 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool