The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Subscribe
Issue No.02 - March-April (2013 vol.17)
pp: 20-27
Dmitry Drutskoy , Elysium Digital
Eric Keller , University of Colorado
Jennifer Rexford , Princeton University
ABSTRACT
Network virtualization gives each "tenant" in a data center its own network topology and control over its traffic flow. Software-defined networking offers a standard interface between controller applications and switch-forwarding tables, and is thus a natural platform for network virtualization. Yet, supporting numerous tenants with different topologies and controller applications raises scalability challenges. The FlowN architecture gives each tenant the illusion of its own address space, topology, and controller, and leverages database technology to efficiently store and manipulate mappings between virtual networks and physical switches.
INDEX TERMS
Switches, Topology, Network topology, Databases, Aerospace electronics, NOX, virtualization, software-defined networks, OpenFlow
CITATION
Dmitry Drutskoy, Eric Keller, Jennifer Rexford, "Scalable Network Virtualization in Software-Defined Networks", IEEE Internet Computing, vol.17, no. 2, pp. 20-27, March-April 2013, doi:10.1109/MIC.2012.144
REFERENCES
1. C. Wilson et al., “Better Never than Late: Meeting Deadlines in Datacenter Networks,” Proc. ACM SIGCOMM 2011 Conf., ACM, 2011, pp. 50–61.
2. N. McKeown et al., “OpenFlow: Enabling Innovation in Campus Networks,” ACM SIGCOMM Computer Comm. Rev., vol. 38, no. 2, 2008, pp. 69–74.
3. N. Gude et al., “NOX: Towards an Operating System for Networks,” ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Rev., vol. 38, no. 3, 2008, pp. 105–110.
4. M.R. Nascimento et al., “Virtual Routers as a Service: The RouteFlow Approach Leveraging Software-Defined Networks,” Proc. Conf. Future Internet Technologies (CFI), ACM, 2011, pp. 34–37.
5. K. Webb, A. Snoeren, and K. Yocum, “Topology Switching for Data Center Networks,” Proc 11th Usenix Conf. Hot Topics in Management of Internet, Cloud, and Enterprise Networks and Services (Hot-ICE), Usenix Assoc., 2011.
6. N. Chowdhury, M. Rahman, and R. Boutaba, “Virtual Network Embedding with Coordinated Node and Link Mapping,” Proc. 28th IEEE Conf. Computer Communications (INFOCOM 09), IEEE, 2009, pp. 783–791.
7. R. Sherwood et al., “Can the Production Network Be the Testbed?” Operating Systems Design and Implementation, Oct. 2010, pp. 365–378.
8. Openflow Switch Specification 1.3.0., Open Networking Foundation, Apr. 2012; www.opennetworking.org/images/stories/downloads/ specificationopenflow-spec-v1.3.0.pdf .
9. Openflow Operations Per Second Controller Benchmark, OpenFlow specification, Mar. 2011; www.openflow.org/wk/index.phpOflops.
16 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool