The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Subscribe
Issue No.01 - Jan.-Feb. (2013 vol.17)
pp: 14-22
Matteo Fiorani , University of Modena and Reggio Emilia
Maurizio Casoni , University of Modena and Reggio Emilia
Slavisa Aleksic , Vienna University of Technology
ABSTRACT
As Internet traffic grows, current core network technologies will raise issues in terms of energy consumption. Here, the authors propose three possible optical network architectures for the next-generation Internet core, including an all-optical hybrid optical switching (HOS) network, an optical/electronic HOS network, and an all-electronic switching network. They evaluate and compare all three networks with regard to performance and power consumption via an event-driven simulator.
INDEX TERMS
Optical switches, Optical fiber networks, Optical packet switching, Power demand, Internet, IP networks, greenhouse-gas emissions, electronic switching, optical switching, energy efficiency
CITATION
Matteo Fiorani, Maurizio Casoni, Slavisa Aleksic, "Hybrid Optical Switching for an Energy-Efficient Internet Core", IEEE Internet Computing, vol.17, no. 1, pp. 14-22, Jan.-Feb. 2013, doi:10.1109/MIC.2012.120
REFERENCES
1. SMART2020: Enabling the Low Carbon Economy in the Information Age, tech. report, the Climate Group, Global eSustainability Initiative, 2008; www.smart2020.org.
2. C. Lange et al., “Energy Consumption of Telecommunication Networks and Related Improvement Options,” IEEE J. Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics, vol. 17, no. 2, 2011, pp. 285–295.
3. Y. Zhang et al., “Energy Efficiency in Telecom Optical Networks,” IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, vol. 12, no. 4, 2010, pp. 441–458.
4. J. Baliga et al., “Energy Consumption in Optical IP Networks,” IEEE J. Lightwave Technology, vol. 27, no. 13, 2009, pp. 2391–2403.
5. S. Aleksic, “Analysis of Power Consumption in Future High-Capacity Network Nodes,” J. Optical Communications and Networking, vol. 1, no. 3, 2009, pp. 245–258.
6. D.J. Blumenthal et al., “Integrated Photonics for Low-Power Packet Networking,” IEEE J. Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics, vol. 17, no. 2, 2011, pp. 458–471.
7. R.S. Tucker, “The Role of Optics and Electronics in High-Capacity Routers,” J. Lightwave Technology, vol. 24, no. 12, 2006, pp. 4655–4673.
8. S. Aleksic, “Energy-Efficient Communication Networks for Improved Global Energy Productivity,” Telecomm. Systems, Springer, 2012, pp. 1–18.
9. J.S. Turner, “Terabit Burst Switching,” J. High Speed Networks, vol. 8, no. 1, 1999, pp. 3–16.
10. R. Cafini et al., “Standard-Based Approach to Programmable Hybrid Networks,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 49, no. 5, 2011, pp. 148–155.
11. M. Takagi et al., “400Gb/s Hybrid Optical Switching Demonstration Combining Multi-Wavelength OPS and OCS with Dynamic Resource Allocation,” Proc. Optical Fiber Communication Conf. (OFC 09), Optical Soc. America (OSA), 2009; www.opticsinfobase.orgabstract.cfm?uri=OFC-2009-OTuA6 .
12. M. Fiorani, M. Casoni, and S. Aleksic, “Performance and Power Consumption Analysis of a Hybrid Optical Core Node,” OSA/IEEE J. Optical Communications and Networking, vol. 3, no. 6, 2011, pp. 502–513.
13. Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) Architecture, IETF RFC 3945, Oct. 2004; www.ietf.org/rfcrfc3945.txt.
14. A. Betker et al., Reference Transport Network Scenarios, tech. report, MultiTeraNet, July 2003.
15. M. Fiorani, M. Casoni, and S. Aleksic, “Analysis of a GMPLS-Enabled HOS Network,” Proc. 16th IEEE Int'l Conf. Optical Networks Design and Modeling (ONDM 12), IEEE, 2012, pp. 1–6.
16. “Guidelines to Defra/DECC's GHG Conversion Factors for Company Reporting,” Am. Economics Assoc. (AEA), 2009; www.defra.gov.uk/publications/filespb13773-ghg-conversion-factors-2012.pdf .
17. “Carbon Offset Factors,” Carbon Neutral Company, 2009; www.carbonneutral.com/interface/files/aboutus/ qualityassuranceThe%20CarbonNeutral%20Protocol.pdf .
28 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool