The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Subscribe
Issue No.06 - Nov.-Dec. (2012 vol.16)
pp: 60-67
L. Deboosere , Ghent Univ., Ghent, Belgium
B. Vankeirsbilck , Ghent Univ., Ghent, Belgium
P. Simoens , Ghent Univ., Ghent, Belgium
F. De Turck , Ghent Univ., Ghent, Belgium
B. Dhoedt , Ghent Univ., Ghent, Belgium
P. Demeester , Ghent Univ., Ghent, Belgium
ABSTRACT
Cloud computing and ubiquitous network availability have renewed people's interest in the thin client concept. By executing applications in virtual desktops on cloud servers, users can access any application from any location with any device. For this to be a successful alternative to traditional offline applications, however, researchers must overcome important challenges. The thin client protocol must display audiovisual output fluidly, and the server executing the virtual desktop should have sufficient resources and ideally be close to the user's current location to limit network delay. From a service provider viewpoint, cost reduction is also an important issue.
INDEX TERMS
ubiquitous computing, client-server systems, cloud computing, cost reduction, cloud-based desktop service, thin client protocol, cloud computing, ubiquitous network, virtual desktop, cloud server, audiovisual output, Protocols, Servers, Mobile communication, Resource management, Delay, Energy consumption, Optimization, cloud computing, Protocols, Servers, Mobile communication, Resource management, Delay, Energy consumption, Optimization, thin client, distributed systems, architectures, mobile computing, algorithm/protocol design and analysis, cloud servers
CITATION
L. Deboosere, B. Vankeirsbilck, P. Simoens, F. De Turck, B. Dhoedt, P. Demeester, "Cloud-Based Desktop Services for Thin Clients", IEEE Internet Computing, vol.16, no. 6, pp. 60-67, Nov.-Dec. 2012, doi:10.1109/MIC.2011.139
REFERENCES
1. R. Buyya et al., “Cloud Computing and Emerging IT Platforms: Vision, Hype, and Reality for Delivering Computing as the 5th Utility,” Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 25, no. 6, 2009, pp. 599–616.
2. A. Lai and J. Nieh, “On the Performance of Wide-Area Thin-Client Computing,” ACM Trans. Computer Systems, vol. 24, no. 2, 2006, pp. 175–209.
3. R. Schwarzkopf et al., “Multi-Layered Virtual Machines for Security Updates in Grid Environments,” Proc. 35th EUROMICRO Conf. Internet Technologies, Quality of Service, and Applications, IEEE Press, 2009, pp. 563–570.
4. N. Tolia, D.G. Andersen, and M. Satyanarayanan, “Quantifying Interactive User Experience on Thin Clients,” Computer, vol. 39, no. 3, 2006, pp. 46–52.
5. F. Travostino et al., “Seamless Live Migration of Virtual Machines over the MAN/WAN,” Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 22, no. 8, 2006, pp. 901–907.
6. “SpeedScreen Latency Reduction Explained,” white paper, Citrix Systems, Dec. 2000.
7. P. Simoens et al., “Design and Implementation of a Hybrid Remote Display Protocol to Optimize Multimedia Experience on Thin Client Devices,” Proc. Australasian Telecomm. Networks and Applications Conf., IEEE Press, 2008, pp. 391–396.
8. B. Vankeirsbilck et al., “Bandwidth Optimization for Mobile Thin Client Computing through Graphical Update Caching,” Proc. Australasian Telecomm. Networks and Applications Conf., IEEE Press, 2008, pp. 385–390.
9. P. Simoens et al., “Remote Display Solutions for Mobile Cloud Computing,” Computer, vol. 44, no. 8, 2011, pp. 46–53.
10. A. Quiroz et al., “Towards Autonomic Workload Provisioning for Enterprise Grids and Clouds,” Proc. IEEE/ACM Int'l Conf. Grid Computing, IEEE Press, 2009, pp. 50–57.
11. Y. Lu, S. Li, and H. Shen, “Virtualized Screen: A Third Element for Cloud-Mobile Convergence,” IEEE Multimedia, vol. 18, no. 2, 2011, pp. 4–11.
12. “XenDesktop Planning Guide — Hosted VM-Based Resource Allocation,” white paper CTX12277, Citrix, 2010.
13. A. Berryman et al., “VDBench: A Benchmarking Toolkit for Thin-Client-Based Virtual Desktop Environments,” Proc. 2nd IEEE Int'l Conf. Cloud Computing Technology and Science, IEEE Press, 2010, pp. 480–487.
14. B. Urgaonkar, P. Shenoy, and T. Roscoe, “Resource Overbooking and Application Profiling in a Shared Internet Hosting Platform,” ACM Trans. Internet Technology, vol. 9, no. 1, 2009, pp. 1–45.
15. U. Lublin and D.G. Feitelson, “The Workload on Parallel Supercomputers: Modeling the Characteristics of Rigid Jobs,” J. Parallel and Distributed Computing, vol. 63, no. 11, 2003, pp. 1105–1122.
18 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool