The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Subscribe
Issue No.06 - November/December (2010 vol.14)
pp: 14-22
Stefano Ceri , Politecnico di Milano
Adnan Abid , Politecnico di Milano
Mamoun Abu Helou , Politecnico di Milano
Davide Barbieri , Politecnico di Milano
Alessandro Bozzon , Politecnico di Milano
Daniele Braga , Politecnico di Milano
Marco Brambilla , Politecnico di Milano
Alessandro Campi , Politecnico di Milano
Francesco Corcoglioniti , Politecnico de Milano
Emanuele Della Valle , Politecnico di Milano
Davide Eynard , Politecnico di Milano
Piero Fraternali , Politecnico di Milano
Michael Grossniklaus , Politecnico di Milano
Davide Martinenghi , Politecnico di Milano
Stefania Ronchi , Politecnico di Milano
Marco Tagliasacchi , Politecnico di Milano
Salvatore Vadacca , Politecnico di Milano
ABSTRACT
Search computing focuses on building answers to complex search queries (for example, "Where can I attend an interesting conference in my field near a sunny beach?") by interacting with a constellation of cooperating search services, and using result ranking and joining as the dominant factors for service composition. The service computing paradigm has so far been neutral to the specific features of search applications and services. To address this weakness, search computing advocates a new approach in which search, join, and ranking are the central aspects for service composition.
INDEX TERMS
search, service composition, information exploration, rank aggregation, search engine, exploratory search
CITATION
Stefano Ceri, Adnan Abid, Mamoun Abu Helou, Davide Barbieri, Alessandro Bozzon, Daniele Braga, Marco Brambilla, Alessandro Campi, Francesco Corcoglioniti, Emanuele Della Valle, Davide Eynard, Piero Fraternali, Michael Grossniklaus, Davide Martinenghi, Stefania Ronchi, Marco Tagliasacchi, Salvatore Vadacca, "Search Computing: Managing Complex Search Queries", IEEE Internet Computing, vol.14, no. 6, pp. 14-22, November/December 2010, doi:10.1109/MIC.2010.106
REFERENCES
1. R. Kumar and A. Tomkins, "A Characterization of Online Search Behaviour," Data Eng. Bull., vol. 32, no. 2, June 2009, pp. 3–11.
2. D. Braga et al., "Optimization of Multi-Domain Queries on the Web," Proc. Very Large Databases (VLDB), ACM Press, 2008, pp. 562–573.
3. R. Baeza-Yates and P. Raghavan, "Next Generation Web Search," Search Computing Challenges and Directions, S. Ceri, and M. Brambilla eds., LNCS 5950, Springer, 2010, pp. 11–23.
4. S. Ceri, and M. Brambilla eds., , Search Computing Challenges and Directions, LNCS 5950, Springer, 2010.
5. M. Brambilla and S. Ceri, "Engineering Search Computing Applications: Vision and Challenges," Proc. 7th Joint Meeting of the European Software Eng. Conf. and the ACM SIGSOFT Symp. Foundations of Software Eng. (ESEC/FSE 09), ACM Press, 2009, pp. 365–372.
6. D. Braga, "Panta Rhei: A Query Execution Environment," Search Computing: Challenges and Directions, LNCS 5950, Springer, 2010, pp. 225–243.
7. D. Braga et al., "Joining the Results of Heterogeneous Search Engines," Information Systems, vol. 33, nos. 7–8, 2008, pp. 658–680.
8. A. Bozzon et al., "Liquid Query: Multi-Domain Exploratory Search on the Web," Proc. 19th Int'l World Wide Web Conf. (WWW 2010), ACM Press, 2010, pp. 161–170.
9. F. Daniel et al., "Understanding UI Integration: A Survey of Problems, Technologies, and Opportunities," IEEE Internet Computing, vol. 11, no. 3, 2007, pp. 59–66.
34 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool