The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Subscribe
Issue No.03 - May/June (2010 vol.14)
pp: 33-41
Raymond Y.K. Lau , City University of Hong Kong
Rachael Kwai Fun Ip , City University of Hong Kong
M.T. Chan , City University of Hong Kong
Ron Chi-Wai Kwok , City University of Hong Kong
Sharon W.M. Wong , City University of Hong Kong
Johnny C.F. So , City University of Hong Kong
Eva Y.W. Wong , City University of Hong Kong
ABSTRACT
Podcasting has the potential to enhance learning by giving students mobile access to course materials anytime, anywhere. In particular, integrating podcasting, electronic learning (e-learning), and traditional face-to-face teaching into a blended learning (b-learning) environment can help create a push-pull educational exchange that increases student learning satisfaction. The authors' empirical study reveals that students generally feel a higher level of social presence and achieve better academic results if they're involved in the development of course podcasts. This research opens the door to the application of emerging Internet technologies to improve student learning.
INDEX TERMS
podcasting, social technologies, blended learning, computer science education, information systems education
CITATION
Raymond Y.K. Lau, Rachael Kwai Fun Ip, M.T. Chan, Ron Chi-Wai Kwok, Sharon W.M. Wong, Johnny C.F. So, Eva Y.W. Wong, "Podcasting: An Internet-Based Social Technology for Blended Learning", IEEE Internet Computing, vol.14, no. 3, pp. 33-41, May/June 2010, doi:10.1109/MIC.2010.74
REFERENCES
1. R.Y.K. Lau et al., "Towards a Fuzzy Domain Ontology Extraction Method for Adaptive E-Learning," IEEE Trans. Knowledge and Data En g., vol. 21, no. 6, 2009, pp. 800–813.
2. H-J. So and T. Brush, "Student Perceptions of Collaborative Learning, Social Presence, and Satisfaction in a Blended Learning Environment: Relationships and Critical Factors," Computers & Education, vol. 51, no. 1, 2008, pp. 318–336.
3. C. Evans, "The Effectiveness of M-Learning in the Form of Podcast Revision Lectures in Higher Education," Computers & Education, vol. 50, 2008, pp. 491–498.
4. J. Copley, "Audio and Video Podcasts of Lecturers for Campus-Based Students: Production and Evaluation of Student Use," Innovations in Education and Teaching Int'l, vol. 44, no. 4, 2007, pp. 387–399.
5. D. Schuler, "Social Computing," Comm. ACM, vol. 37, no. 1, 1994, pp. 28–29.
6. R. Ip and C. Wagner, "Weblogging: A Study of Social Computing and its Impact on Organizations," Decision Support Systems, vol. 45, no. 2, 2008, pp. 242–250.
7. R. Ip et al., "Enhancing Student's Learning with Podcasting, a Newly Emergent Social Technology," Proc. 2008 Pacific Asia Conf. Information Systems, Assoc. of Information Systems, 2008, paper 186; http://aisel.aisnet.org/pacis2008186.
8. J.R. Beilke, M.J. Stuve, and M.A.W. Hawkins, "Clubcasting: Educational Uses of podcasting in Multicultural Settings," Multicultural Education & Technology J., vol. 2, no. 2, 2008, pp. 107–117.
9. M.J.W. Lee, C. McLoughlin, and A. Chan, "Talk the Talk: Learner-Generated Podcasts as Catalysts for Knowledge Creation," British J. Education Technology, vol. 39, no. 3, 2008, pp. 501–521.
10. N.E. Perry, L. Phillips, and L.R. Hutchinson, "Mentoring Student Teachers to Support for Self-Regulated Learning," Elementary School J., vol. 106, no. 3, 2006, pp. 237–254.
11. L.K. Trevino, R.K. Lengel, and R.L. Daft, "Media Symbolism, Media Richness, and Media Choice in Organizations," Communication Research, vol. 14, no. 5, 1987, pp. 553–574.
12. R.J. Hollandsworth, "Managing the Podcast Lecture: A Hybrid Approach for Online Lectures in the Business Classroom," TechTrends, vol. 51, no. 4, 2007, pp. 39–44.
13. D.L. Goodhue and R.L. Thompson, "Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance," MIS Quarterly, vol. 19, no. 2, 1995, pp. 213–236.
14. J. Short, E. Williams, and B. Christie, The Social Psychology of Communication, John Wiley, 1976.
15. J.B. Lohmoller, "Predictive vs. Structural Modeling: PLS vs. ML," Latent Variable Path Modeling with Partial Least Squares, Physica-Verlag, 1989, pp. 212–255.
73 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool