The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Subscribe
Issue No.04 - July/August (2009 vol.13)
pp: 18-25
Stefaan Ternier , Open University of the Netherlands
Katrien Verbert , Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium
Gonzalo Parra , Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium
Bram Vandeputte , Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium
Joris Klerkx , Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium
Erik Duval , Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium
Vicente Ordóñez , Escuela Superior Politecnica del Litoral
Xavier Ochoa , Escuela Superior Politecnica del Litoral
ABSTRACT
Reusing digital resources for learning has been a goal for several decades, driven by potential time savings and quality enhancements. Although the rapid development of Web-based learning has increased opportunities for reuse significantly, managing learning objects and making them accessible still entails many challenges. This article presents and analyzes the standards-based Ariadne infrastructure for managing learning objects in an open and scalable architecture. The architecture supports the integration of learning objects in multiple, distributed repository networks. The authors capture lessons learned in four architectural patterns.
INDEX TERMS
learning object metadata, learning object repositories, federated search, harvesting, Internet, e-learning, Emerging E-Learning Technologies
CITATION
Stefaan Ternier, Katrien Verbert, Gonzalo Parra, Bram Vandeputte, Joris Klerkx, Erik Duval, Vicente Ordóñez, Xavier Ochoa, "The Ariadne Infrastructure for Managing and Storing Metadata", IEEE Internet Computing, vol.13, no. 4, pp. 18-25, July/August 2009, doi:10.1109/MIC.2009.90
REFERENCES
1. R. Robson, "Context and the Role of Standards in Increasing the Value of Learning Objects," Online Education Using Learning Objects, R. McGreal ed., Routledge/Falmer, 2004, pp. 159–167.
2. S. Ternier, and E. Duval, "Interoperability of Repositories: The Simple Query Interface in Ariadne," Int'l J. E-Learning, vol. 5, no. 1, 2006, pp. 161–166.
3. B. Simon et al., "A Simple Query Interface for Interoperable Learning Repositories," Proc. 1st Workshop Interoperability of Web-Based Educational Systems, CEUR, 2005, pp. 11–18.
4. S. Ternier et al., "A Simple Publishing Interface for Learning Object Repositories," Proc. World Conf. Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia, and Telecommunications, Assoc. for the Advancement of Computing in Education, 2008, pp. 1840–1845.
5. C. Lagoze and H. Van de Sompel, "The Open Archives Initiative: Building a Low-Barrier Interoperability Framework," Proc. 1st ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conf. Digital Libraries, ACM Press, 2001, pp. 54–62.
6. S. Ternier et al., "Interoperability for Searching Learning Object Repositories: The ProLearn Query Language," D-Lib Magazine, vol. 14, nos. 1–2, 2008.
7. W. Nejdl et al., "Edutella: A P2P Networking Infrastructure Based on RDF," Proc. 11th Int'l Conf. World Wide Web, ACM Press, 2002, pp. 604–615.
8. S.H. McCallum,, "A Look at New Information Retrieval Protocols: SRU, OpenSearch/a9, CQL, and XQuery," World Library and Information Congress: 72nd IFLA General Conf. and Council, Int'l Federation of Library Assoc. and Institutions (IFLA), 2006.
9. R. Sanderson, J. Young, and R. Le Van, "SRW/U with OAI: Expected and Unexpected Synergies," D-Lib Magazine, vol. 11, no. 2, 2005.
10. T.W. Cole et al., Implementation of a Scholarly Information Portal using the Open Archives Initiative Protocol for Metadata Harvesting, tech. report, Univ. Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2003.
26 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool