The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Subscribe
Issue No.02 - March/April (2009 vol.13)
pp: 44-50
Dezhi Wu , Southern Utah University
Michael Bieber , New Jersey Institute of Technology
Starr Roxanne Hiltz , New Jersey Institute of Technology
ABSTRACT
The Asynchronous Learning Networks Participatory Examination (APE) is a constructivist approach that fully engages students in the entire exam life cycle. Students design and solve exam questions while evaluating their peers' solutions using an anonymous, structured process enabled by Internet technologies. APE achieves higher-level learning by encouraging students to tap into all levels of cognitive skills. Compared to the traditional exam experiences in most classes, most students prefer APE, enjoy its process, and recommend its use. APE liberates both students and instructors by reengineering the examination process and deepening learning throughout.
INDEX TERMS
learning, exam, participatory exam, peer assessment, e-learning, constructivism, distance learning, asynchronous learning networks, virtual learning environment
CITATION
Dezhi Wu, Michael Bieber, Starr Roxanne Hiltz, "Asynchronous Participatory Exams: Internet Innovation for Engaging Students", IEEE Internet Computing, vol.13, no. 2, pp. 44-50, March/April 2009, doi:10.1109/MIC.2009.27
REFERENCES
1. E.L. Thorndike, Fundamentals of Learning, Teacher College Press, 1932.
2. D.W. Johnson and R.T. Johnson, Learning Together and Alone: Cooperation, Competition, and Individualization, Prentice Hall, 1975.
3. T.A. Angelo, "Definition of Assessment," AAHE Bulletin,7 Nov. 1995.
4. S.R. Hiltz and R. Goldman eds., Learning Together Online: Research on Asynchronous Learning Networks, Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc., 2004.
5. M.M. Danchak, and M. Huguet, "Designing for the Changing Role of the Instructor in Blended Learning," IEEE Trans. Professional Comm., vol. 47, no. 3, Sept. 2004, pp. 200–210.
6. T. Koschmann et al., "Computer-Supported Problem-Based Learning: A Principled Approach to the Use of Computers in Collaborative Learning," T. Koschmann ed., , CSCL: Theory and Practice, Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc., 1996, pp. 83–124.
7. M.D. Medley, "Online Finals for CS1 and CS2," Proc. Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE), ACM Press, 1998, pp. 178–180.
8. D. Woit and D. Mason, "Enhancing Student Learning through Online Quizzes," Proc. ACM Conf. Computer Science Education (SIGCSE 2000), ACM Press, 2000, pp. 367–371.
9. E. Liu, S. Lin, and S. Yuan, "Alternatives to Instructor Assessment: A Case Study of Comparing Self and Peer Assessment with Instructor Assessment under a Networked Innovative Assessment Procedure," Int'l J. Instructional Media, vol. 29, no. 4, 2002, pp. 395–404.
10. J. McGourty, P. Dominick, and R.R. Reilly, "Incorporating Student Peer Review and Feedback into the Assessment Process," Proc. Frontiers in Education Conf. (FIE 98), IEEE CS Press, 1998, pp. 14–18.
11. D. Wu et al., "Constructivist Learning with Participatory Examinations," Proc. 34th Hawaii Int'l Conf. Systems Sciences, track 1, IEEE CS Press, 2004, p. 10004a.
12. K. Cho and C.D. Schunn, "Scaffolded Writing and Rewriting in the Discipline: A Web-Based Reciprocal Peer Review System," Computers &Education, vol. 48, no. 3, 2005, pp. 409–426.
13. B.S. Bloom, A Taxonomy of Education Objectives: Handbook I, The Cognitive Domain, McKay, 1956.
14. D. Wu and S.R. Hiltz, "Predicting Learning from Asynchronous Online Discussions," J. Asynchronous Learning Networks, vol. 8, no. 2, 2004, pp. 139–152.
15. J. Shen, "Collaborative Examinations in Asynchronous Learning Networks: Field Experiments on Collaborative Learning through Online Assessments," PhD dissertation, New Jersey Inst. Technology, 2005.
19 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool