The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Subscribe
Issue No.02 - March/April (2008 vol.12)
pp: 13-19
Alvaro Arenas , STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
Michael Wilson , STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
Shirley Crompton , STFC Daresbury Laboratory
Dana Cojocarasu , University of Oslo
Tobias Mahler , University of Oslo
Lutz Schubert , University of Stuttgart
ABSTRACT
Two or more parties typically establish a business relationship using a contract, but a large gap still exists between the provisions of contracts produced by lawyers and the details of computer security and performance addressed by technologists. Some contractual clauses address legal issues that technology can manage as well ? the TrustCoM framework offers a paradigm for automating these clauses as technical operations. If a business relationship forms across a service-oriented architecture, the parties involved often manage their collaboration as a virtual organization (VO). In TrustCoM, agreements are the key means of steering VO collaborations and mitigating the risks inherent in integrating processes and resources across organizational boundaries.
INDEX TERMS
Virtual organizations, contract law, contract management, service-level agreements, SLAs, enterprise networks
CITATION
Alvaro Arenas, Michael Wilson, Shirley Crompton, Dana Cojocarasu, Tobias Mahler, Lutz Schubert, "Bridging the Gap between Legal and Technical Contracts", IEEE Internet Computing, vol.12, no. 2, pp. 13-19, March/April 2008, doi:10.1109/MIC.2008.28
REFERENCES
1. T. Dimitrakos, D. Golby, and P. Kearney, "Towards a Trust and Contract Management Framework for Dynamic Virtual Organisations," eAdoption and the Knowledge Economy: eChallenges 2004, IOS Press, 2004, pp. 1199–1207.
2. T. Mahler and F. Vraalsen, "Legal Risk Management for an E-Learning Web Services Collaboration," Legal, Privacy and Security Issues in Information Technology, S.M. Kierkegaard, ed., Unipub/Complex, 2006, pp. 503–523.
3. R. Morgan and K. Burden, Morgan and Burden on Computer Contracts, 7th ed., Sweet &Maxwell, 2005.
4. N. Damianou et al., "The Ponder Policy Specification Language," Proc. Policy Workshop 2001, LNCS 1995, Springer-Verlag, 2001, pp. 18–38.
5. M. Wilson, L. Schubert, and A.E. Arenas, eds., The TrustCoM Framework for Trust, Security and Contract Management of Web Services and the Grid, version 4, tech. report RAL-TR-2007-005, 2007; http://epubs.cclrc.ac.ukwork-details?w=37589 .
6. A.E. Arenas et al., "Toward Web Services Profiles for Trust and Security in Virtual Organizations," Proc. 6th IFIT Working Conf. Virtual Enterprises, Springer, 2005, pp. 175–182.
7. S. Crompton et al., "The TrustCoM General Virtual Organization Agreement Component," Proc. UK e-Science All Hands Meeting, UK Nat'l e-Science Centre, 2007; www.allhands.org.uk/2007/proceedings/papers 771.pdf.
8. J. Haller, Y. Karabulut, and P. Robinson, "Security Controls in Collaborative Business Processes," Proc. 6th IFIP Working Conf. Virtual Enterprises, Springer, 2005, pp. 247–254.
9. B. Koller and L. Schubert, "Towards Autonomous SLA Management Using a Proxy-Like Approach," Proc. NODe 2005, Köllen, 2005, pp. 259–275.
10. J. Haller, L. Schubert, and S. Wesner, "Private Business Infrastructures in a VO Environment," Exploiting the Knowledge Economy: Issues, Applications, Case Studies, P. Cunningham and M. Cunningham, eds., IOS Press, 2006, pp. 1064–1071.
11. D. Golby et al., "An Assured Environment for Collaborative Engineering Using Web Services," Proc. 13th ISPE Int'l Conf. Concurrent Eng., IOS Press, 2006, pp. 111–119.
12. Z. Milosevic, M. Orlowska, and S. Sadiq, "Linking Contracts, Processes and Services: An Event-Driven Approach," IEEE Int'l Conf. Service Computing, IEEE CS Press, 2006, pp. 390–397.
13. A. Josang, R. Ismail, and C. Boyd, "A Survey of Trust and Reputation Systems for Online Service Provision," Decision Support Systems, vol. 43, no. 2, 2007, pp. 618–644.
14. R.J. Rabelo et al., "The ECOLead ICT Infrastructure for Collaborative Networked Organizations," Proc. 7th IFIP Working Conf. Virtual Enterprises, Springer, 2006, pp. 451–460.
43 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool