The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Issue No.03 - May-June (2013 vol.28)
pp: 38-45
Veronica Perez Rosas , University of North Texas
Rada Mihalcea , University of Michigan
Louis-Philippe Morency , University of Southern California
Using multimodal sentiment analysis, the presented method integrates linguistic, audio, and visual features to identify sentiment in online videos. In particular, experiments focus on a new dataset consisting of Spanish videos collected from YouTube that are annotated for sentiment polarity.
Spanish, Visualization, Feature extraction, Intelligent systems, Pragmatics, Natural language processing, Text analysis, Computational linguistics, Sentiment analysis,multimodal natural language processing, Spanish, Visualization, Feature extraction, Intelligent systems, Pragmatics, Natural language processing, Text analysis, Computational linguistics, Sentiment analysis, intelligent systems, sentiment analysis
Veronica Perez Rosas, Rada Mihalcea, Louis-Philippe Morency, "Multimodal Sentiment Analysis of Spanish Online Videos", IEEE Intelligent Systems, vol.28, no. 3, pp. 38-45, May-June 2013, doi:10.1109/MIS.2013.9
1. M. Hu and B. Liu, “Mining and Summarizing Customer Reviews,” Proc. 10th ACM SIGKDD Int'l Conf. Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, ACM, 2004, pp. 168-177.
2. C. Alm, D. Roth, and R. Sproat, “Emotions from Text: Machine Learning for Text-Based Emotion Prediction,” Proc. Conf. Human Language Technology and Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Assoc. for Computational Linguistics (ACL), 2005, pp. 579-589.
3. L. Lloyd, D. Kechagias, and S. Skiena, “Lydia: A System for Large-Scale News Analysis,” String Processing and Information Retrieval, LNCS 3772, 2005, pp. 161-166.
4. P. Carvalho et al., “Liars and Saviors in a Sentiment Annotated Corpus of Comments to Political Debates,” Proc. Assoc. for Computational Linguistics, ACL, 2011, pp. 564-568.
5. H. Yu and V. Hatzivassiloglou, “Towards Answering Opinion Questions: Separating Facts from Opinions and Identifying the Polarity of Opinion Sentences,” Proc. Conf. Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, ACL, 2003, pp. 129-136.
6. G. Carenini, R. Ng, and X. Zhou, “Summarizing Emails with Conversational Cohesion and Subjectivity,” Proc. Assoc. for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, ACL, 2008, pp. 353-361.
7. J. Wiebe and E. Riloff, “Creating Subjective and Objective Sentence Classifiers from Unannotated Texts,” Proc. 6th Int'l Conf. Intelligent Text Processing and Computational Linguistics, Springer, 2005, pp. 486-497.
8. A. Esuli and F. Sebastiani, “SentiWordNet: A Publicly Available Lexical Resource for Opinion Mining,” Proc. 5th Conf. Language Resources and Evaluation, Springer, 2006, pp. 417-422.
9. B. Pang and L. Lee, “A Sentimental Education: Sentiment Analysis Using Subjectivity Summarization Based on Minimum Cuts,” Proc. 42nd Meeting of the Assoc. Computational Linguistics, ACL, 2004, pp. 271-278.
10. A. Maas et al., “Learning Word Vectors for Sentiment Analysis,” Proc. Assoc. Computational Linguistics, ACL, 2011, pp. 142-150.
11. D. Chen and R. Mooney, “Panning for Gold: Finding Relevant Semantic Content for Grounded Language Learning,” Proc. Symp. Machine Learning in Speech and Language Processing, 2011;∼ml/paperschen.mlslp11.pdf .
12. C. Banea, R. Mihalcea, and J. Wiebe, “Multilingual Sentiment and Subjectivity,” Multilingual Natural Language Processing, Prentice Hall, 2011.
13. T. Plotz and G.A. Fink, “Markov Models for Offline Handwriting Recognition: A Survey,” Int'l J. Document Analysis and Recognition, vol. 12, no. 4, 2009.
14. J. Arguello and C. Rose, “Topic Segmentation of Dialogue,” Proc. HLT-NAACL Workshop on Analyzing Conversations in Text and Speech, ACL, 2009, pp. 42-49.
15. F. Eyben, M. Wollmer, and B. Schuller, “OpenEAR—Introducing the Munich Open Source Emotion and Affect Recognition Toolkit,” Proc. Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction and Workshops, IEEE, 2009; doi:10.1109/ACII2009.5349350.
16. V. Vapnik, The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory, Springer, New York, 1995.
77 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool