The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Issue No.02 - March-April (2013 vol.28)
pp: 64-73
Antonio Garrido , Universitat Politècnica de València
Eva Onaindia , Universitat Politècnica de València
The aim of educational systems is to assemble learning objects on a set of topics tailored to the goals and individual students' styles. Given the amount of available Learning Objects, the challenge of e-learning is to select the proper objects, define their relationships, and adapt their sequencing to the specific needs, objectives, and background of the student. This article describes the general requirements for course adaptation, the full potential of applying planning techniques on the construction of personalized e-learning routes, and how to accommodate the temporal and resource constraints to make the course applicable in a real scenario.
Learning systems, Java, Intelligent systems, Electronic learning, Knowledge management, Context awarebess, e-learning, Learning systems, Java, Intelligent systems, Electronic learning, Knowledge management, Context awarebess, planning, applications and expert knowledge-intensive systems, personalized learning, education
Antonio Garrido, Eva Onaindia, "Assembling Learning Objects for Personalized Learning: An AI Planning Perspective", IEEE Intelligent Systems, vol.28, no. 2, pp. 64-73, March-April 2013, doi:10.1109/MIS.2011.36
1. E. Guzman, R. Conejo, and J.L. Perez de la Cruz,“Improving Student Performance Using Self-Assessment Tests,” IEEE Intelligent Systems, vol. 22, no. 4, 2007, pp. 46–52.
2. L.P. Santacruz-Valencia et al., “Comparison of Knowledge during the Assembly Process of Learning Objects,” J. Intelligent Information Systems, vol. 35, no. 1, 2009, pp. 51–74.
3. T. Tiropanis et al., “Semantic Technologies for Learning and Teaching in the Web 2.0 Era,” IEEE Intelligent Systems, vol. 24, no. 6, 2009, pp. 49–53.
4. “Draft Standard for Learning Object Metadata,” rev. 16, IEEE, Feb. 2005; .
5. M. Schindler and D. Vrandeccic, “Introducing New Features to Wikipedia: Case Studies for Web Science,” IEEE Intelligent Systems, vol. 26, no. 1, 2011, pp. 56–61.
6. V. Tamma, “Semantic Web Support for Intelligent Search and Retrieval of Business Knowledge,” IEEE Intelligent Systems, vol. 25, no. 1, 2010, pp. 84–88.
7. R.M. Felder and L.K. Silverman, “Learning and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education,” Eng. Education, vol. 78, no. 7, 1988, pp. 674–681.
8. P. Mika et al., “Learning to Tag and Tagging to Learn: A Case Study on Wikipedia,” IEEE Intelligent Systems, vol. 23, no. 5, 2008, pp. 26–33.
9. C. Ullrich and E. Melis, “Complex Course Generation Adapted to Pedagogical Scenarios and Its Evaluation,” J. Educational Technology and Society, vol. 13, no. 2, 2010, pp. 102–115.
10. A. Garrido and E. Onaindia, “On the Application of Planning and Scheduling Techniques to e-Learning,” Proc. 23rd Int'l Conf. Industrial Eng. and Other Applications of Applied Intelligent Systems (IEA-AIE 2010), LNAI 6096, Springer, 2010, pp. 244–253.
11. N. Idris, N. Yusof, and P. Saad, “Adaptive Course Sequencing for Personalization of Learning Path Using Neural Networks,” Int'l J. Advances in Soft Computing and Its Applications, vol. 1, no. 1, 2009, pp. 49–61.
12. E. Kontopoulos et al., “An Ontology-Based Planning System for e-Course Generation,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 35, nos. 1–2, 2008, pp. 398–406.
13. A. Garrido et al., “Modeling e-Learning Activities in Automated Planning,” Proc. 3rd Int'l Competition on Knowledge Eng. for Planning and Scheduling (ICKEPS-ICAPS 2009), 2009, pp. 18–27.
26 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool