The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Subscribe
Issue No.01 - Jan.-Feb. (2013 vol.28)
pp: 26-33
Cheryl Giammanco , US Army Research Laboratory
Ray McGowan , US Army Communications—Electronics Research, Development & Engineering Center
Anne Kao , Boeing Research & Technology
Stephen R. Poteet , Boeing Research & Technology
Tien Pham , US Army Research Laboratory
Ping Xue , Boeing Research & Technology
ABSTRACT
This article describes ongoing research on data integration and query services for knowledge management. For such services, Controlled English (CE), a human-friendly, machine-readable language, can represent information content and context.
INDEX TERMS
Data models, Information retrieval, Knowledge management, Distributed databases, Information management, Data integration, human-centered computing, knowledge management applications, natural language processing, query languages
CITATION
Cheryl Giammanco, Ray McGowan, Anne Kao, Dave Braines, Stephen R. Poteet, Tien Pham, Ping Xue, "Knowledge Management for Coalition Information Sharing at the Network Edge", IEEE Intelligent Systems, vol.28, no. 1, pp. 26-33, Jan.-Feb. 2013, doi:10.1109/MIS.2012.104
REFERENCES
1. The US Army Functional Concepts for Intelligence 2016-2028 TRADOC Pam 525-2-1, tech. report., US Army Training and Doctrine Command, Oct. 2010; www.tradoc.army.mil/tpubsregndx.htm.
2. J. Burlas Soundoff! The Online Version of Ft Meade's Own Community Paper, US Army News Service, Patuxent Publishing and Baltimore Sun Media Group, May 2004; www.ftmeadesoundoff.com/news/632actionable-intelligence-relies-every-soldier /.
3. The US Army Concept for Building Partner Capacity 2016-2028 TRADOC Pam 525-8-4, tech. report, US Army Training and Doctrine Command, Nov. 2011; www.tradoc.army.mil/tpubs/pamstp525-8-4.pdf .
4. G.H. Cirincione et al., “Coalition Operations: Trends, Research Issues, and Emerging Results,” IEEE Intelligent Systems, submitted to special issue on Knowledge Systems for Coalition Operations, Jan. 2013.
5. D. Mott, Summary of ITA Controlled English, tech. report, US/UK Int'l Technology Alliance in Network and Information Science, May 2010; www.usukita.org/papers/5658details.html.
6. J. Graham, SYNCOIN Dataset, tech. report, Center for Network Centric Cognition and Information Fusion, Pennsylvania State Univ., version 1.4, 2011.
7. D. Mott et al., “Hybrid Rationale and Controlled Natural Language for Shared Understanding,” Proc. Knowledge Systems for Coalition Operations, KSCO, 2010; http://ksco.info/ksco/ksco-2010/papers10-10-Mott-modusponens.pdf .
8. J. Patel et al., “Making Plans Alive,” Proc. Knowledge Systems for Coalition Operations, KSCO, 2010; http://ksco.info/ksco/ksco-2010/papers10-06-Dorneich-Plans.pdf .
9. Counterinsurgency Field Manual 3-24, Dept. of the Army, Dec. 2006; www.fas.org/irp/doddir/armyfm3-24.pdf.
10. C. Giammanco and D. Mott, “The Commander's Intent Represented in Controlled English,” Communication, June 2012.
11. A. Preece et al., “Integrating Hard and Soft Information Sources for D2D Using Controlled Natural Language,” Proc. 15th Int'l Conf. Information Fusion, IEEE, 2012; http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xplsabs_all.jsp?arnumber=6289961 .
12. C. Fellbaum, WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database, MIT Press, 1998.
13. P. Xue et al., “Information Extractions Using Controlled English to Support Knowledge-Sharing and Decision-Making,” Proc. 17th Int'l Command and Control Research and Technology Symp. 2012: Operationalizing C2 Agility, to appear, 2012.
14. L. Haas, E. Lin, and M. Roth, “Data Integration through Database Federation,” IBM Systems J., vol. 41, no. 4, 2002, pp. 578–596.
15. M. Newman, “The Structure and Function of Complex Networks,” SIAM Rev., vol. 45, 2003, pp. 167–256.
16. P. Smart and N. Shadbolt, “The Semantic Battlespace Infosphere: A Knowledge Infrastructure for Improved Coalition Inter-Operability,” Proc. 4th Int'l Conf. Knowledge Systems for Coalition Operations, 2007; eprints.soton.ac.uk/264114/.
17. G. Bent et al., “A Dynamic Distributed Federated Database,” Proc. 2nd Ann. Conf. Int'l Technology Alliance in Network and Information Sciences, 2008; www.usukita.org/node1461.
18. “Overview of Provincial Reconstruction Team,” British Embassy Kabul,31 Aug. 2012; http://ukinafghanistan.fco.gov.uk/en/about-us/ working-with-afghanistan/prt-helmand overview-prt-helmand.
19. “How To Do It? A Different Way of Organizing the Government,” 9/11 Commission Report, W.W. Norton & Company, 2004, pp. 416–419.
20. P. Chlebo Jr., G. Christman, and R. Johnson, “Enhancing Collective C2 in the International Environment: Leveraging the Unclassified Information Sharing Enterprise Service,” Proc. 16th Int'l Command and Control Research and Technology Symp. 2011: Collective C2 in Multinational Civil-Military Operations, 2011; www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2a546626.pdf .
21. ADT Project: Building Civil-Military Collaboration for Stabilization and Development, US Army Nat'l Guard Agribusiness Development Team, 2012; http:/adtproject.org.
22. Agribusiness Development Teams in Afghanistan Handbook: Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures, Center for Army Lessons Learned, Nov. 2009; http:/call.army.mil.
23. A. Seffah, N. Kececi, and M. Donyaee, “QUIM: A Framework for Quantifying Usability Metrics in Software Quality Models,” Proc. 2nd Asia-Pacific Conf. Quality Software, Dec. 2001, pp. 311–318.
24. A. Seffah et al., “Usability Measurement and Metrics: A Consolidated Model,” Software Quality J., vol. 14, no. 2, 2006, pp. 159–178.
25. N. Bevan, “Quality in Use: Meeting User Needs for Quality,” J. Systems and Software, vol. 49, no. 1, 1999, pp. 89–96.
26. S. Hart and L. Staveland, “Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research,” Human Mental Workload, Elsevier, 1988, pp. 139–183.
6 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool