The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Issue No.02 - March-April (2012 vol.27)
pp: 27-35
In real-life situations, robots often need to collaborate with humans. An experience and communication model supports the necessary shared activities.
team working, control engineering computing, groupware, human-robot interaction, shared activity, situated communication, joint activity, human-robot teams, real-life situations, communication model, Robot kinematics, Human factors, Human-robot interaction, Robot sensing systems, Intelligent systems, Speech recognition, Collaborative work, Urban areas, human-robot team, human-robot interaction, urban search and rescue, spoken dialog processing, situated communication
H. Zender, Geert-Jan Kruijff, M. Janicek, "Situated communication for joint activity in human-robot teams", IEEE Intelligent Systems, vol.27, no. 2, pp. 27-35, March-April 2012, doi:10.1109/MIS.2012.8
1. G. Klein et al., “Common Ground and Coordination in Joint Activity,” Organizational Simulation, W.B. Rouse, and K.R. Boff eds., John Wiley & Sons, 2004, pp. 139–184.
2. G. Klein et al., “Ten Challenges for Making Automation a 'Team Player' in Joint Human-Agent Activity,” IEEE Intelligent Systems, vol. 19, no. 6, 2004, pp. 91–95.
3. P.M. Salmon et al., , Distributed Situation Awareness: Theory, Measurement, and Application to Teamwork, Ashgate, 2009.
4. H. Zender et al., “Conceptual Spatial Representations for Indoor Mobile Robots,” Robotics and Autonomous Systems, vol. 56, no. 6, 2008, pp. 493–502.
5. D. Stachowicz and G.J. Kruijff, “Episodic-Like Memory for Cognitive Robots,” to be published in IEEE Trans. Autonomous Mental Development.
6. P. Lison, C. Ehrler, and G.J. Kruijff, “Belief Modelling for Situation Awareness in Human-Robot Interaction,” Proc. 19th Int'l Symp. Robot and Human Interactive Communication (Ro-Man 10), IEEE, 2010, pp. 138–143.
7. G.J. Kruijff, M. Janíček,, and P. Lison, “Continual Processing of Situated Dialogue in Human-Robot Collaborative Activities,” Proc. 19th Int'l. Symp. Robot and Human Interactive Communication (Ro-Man 10), IEEE, 2010, pp. 594–599.
8. M. Stone, “Intention, Interpretation and the Computational Structure of Language,” Cognitive Science, vol. 28, no. 5, 2004, pp. 781–809.
9. M. Stone and R. Thomason, “Context in Abductive Interpretation,” Proc. 6th Workshop Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue (EDILOG 02), Univ. of Edinburgh, 2002, pp. 169–176.
10. P. Lison and G.J. Kruijff, “Efficient Parsing of Spoken Inputs for Human-Robot Interaction,” Proc. 19th Int'l Symp. Robot and Human Interactive Communication (Ro-Man 09), IEEE, 2009, pp. 885–890.
11. G.J. Kruijff et al., “Situated Dialogue Processing for Human-Robot Interaction,” Cognitive Systems, H.I. Christensen, G-J. Kruijff, and J.L. Wyatt eds., Springer, 2010, pp. 311–364.
12. G.J. Kruijff, M. Brenner, and N.A. Hawes, “Continual Planning for Cross-Modal Situated Clarification in Human-Robot Interaction,” Proc. 18th Int'l Symp. Robot and Human Interactive Communication (Ro-Man 08), IEEE, 2008, pp. 592–597.
13. H. Khambhaita et al., “Help Me to Help You: How to Learn Intentions, Actions, and Plans,” Proc. AAAI Spring Symp. Help Me Help You: Bridging the Gaps in Human-Agent Collaboration, AAAI Press, 2011, pp. 30–35.
14. G.J. Kruijff et al., “Situated Dialogue and Spatial Organization: What, Where … and Why?” Int'l J. Advanced Robotic Systems, vol. 4, no. 2, 2007, pp. 125–138.
15. D.D. Woods et al., “Envisioning Human-Robot Coordination for Future Operations,” IEEE Trans. Systems, Man and Cybernetics, vol. 34, no. 2, 2004, pp. 210–218.
16. J. Burke et al., “Moonlight in Miami: An Ethnographic Study of Human-Robot Interaction in USAR,” Human Computer Interaction, vol. 19, nos. 1–2, 2004, pp. 85–116.
17. R. Parasuraman, M. Barnes, and K. Cosenzo, “Adaptive Automation for Human-Robot Teaming in Future Command and Control Systems,” Int'l J. Command and Control, vol. 1, no. 2, 2007, pp. 43–68.
18. R. Murphy et al., “Search and Rescue Robotics,” Springer Handbook of Robotics, B. Siciliano, and O. Khatib eds., Springer, 2008, pp. 1151–1173.
34 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool