|
| This Article | ||
| ||
| Share | ||
| Bibliographic References | ||
| Add to: | ||
 Digg  Furl  Spurl  Blink  Simpy  Google  Del.icio.us  Y!MyWeb | ||
| Search | ||
| ||
| ASCII Text | x | ||
| Justin Fidock, Jennie Carroll, "Why Do Users Employ the Same System in So Many Different Ways?," IEEE Intelligent Systems, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 32-39, July/August, 2011. | |||
| BibTex | x | ||
| @article{ 10.1109/MIS.2011.43, author = {Justin Fidock and Jennie Carroll}, title = {Why Do Users Employ the Same System in So Many Different Ways?}, journal ={IEEE Intelligent Systems}, volume = {26}, number = {4}, issn = {1541-1672}, year = {2011}, pages = {32-39}, doi = {http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/MIS.2011.43}, publisher = {IEEE Computer Society}, address = {Los Alamitos, CA, USA}, } | |||
| RefWorks Procite/RefMan/Endnote | x | ||
| TY - MGZN JO - IEEE Intelligent Systems TI - Why Do Users Employ the Same System in So Many Different Ways? IS - 4 SN - 1541-1672 SP32 EP39 EPD - 32-39 A1 - Justin Fidock, A1 - Jennie Carroll, PY - 2011 KW - intelligent systems KW - technology appropriation KW - theories of change KW - multiple methods KW - email KW - human-centered computing VL - 26 JA - IEEE Intelligent Systems ER - | |||
A technology appropriation perspective, augmented by complementary theories of change and the use of multiple methods, is a powerful way of explaining diverse uses of a system.
1. F.D. Davis et al., "User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models," Management Science, vol. 35, 1989, pp. 982–1003.
2. J. Carroll, "Completing Design in Use: Closing the Appropriation Cycle," Proc. 12th European Conf. Information Systems (ECIS 2004), CS-ROM, 2004.
3. A. Van de Ven and M.S. Poole, "Explaining Development and Change in Organizations," Academy of Management Rev., vol. 20, no. 3, 1995, pp. 510–540.
4. J. Carroll et al., "A Field Study of Perceptions and Use of Mobile Telephones by 16 to 22 Year Olds," J. Information Technology Theory and Application, vol. 4, no. 2, 2002, pp. 49–60.
5. V. Venkatesh et al., "User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View," MIS Quarterly, vol. 27, no. 3, 2003, pp. 425–478.
6. M.D. Myers, "Dialectical Hermeneutics: A Theoretical Framework for the Implementation of Information Systems," Information Systems J., vol. 5, no. 1, 1994, pp. 51–70.
7. M.J. Tyre and W.J. Orlikowski, "Windows of Opportunity: Temporal Patterns of Technological Adaptation in Organizations," Organization Science, vol. 5, no. 1, 1994, pp. 98–118.
8. J. Fidock, "From Evaluation to Action: Supporting the Co-evolution of Business Practices and IT in the Government Sector," Proc. 9th European Conf. IT Evaluation (ECITE), Academic Conferences Limited, 2002, pp. 145–153.
9. A. Mendoza et al., "Plateaus in Long-Term Appropriation of an Information System," Proc. 18th Australasian Conf. Information Systems ( ACIS), The Univ. of Southern Queensland, 2007, pp. 189–198.
10. J. Pfeffer, Organizations and Organization Theory, Pitman, 1982.
11. V. Stewart, "Business Applications of Repertory Grid," 1997; www.enquirewithin.co.nz.
12. J. Carroll, "Technology Portfolios: A Metaphor for Users Technology Selections while Mobile?" Proc. 16th Australasian Conf. Information Systems (ACIS 2005), CD-ROM, 2005.
13. J. Jasperson et al., "A Comprehensive Conceptualization of Post-adoptive Behaviors Associated with Information Technology Enabled Work Systems," MIS Quarterly, vol. 29, no. 3, 2005, pp. 525–557.
14. W.E. Mackay, "More Than Just a Communication System: Diversity in the Use of Electronic Mail," Proc. ACM Conf. Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), ACM Press, 1988, pp. 344–353.
15. W. Orlikowski, "The Duality of Tech-nology: Rethinking the Concept of Techno-logy in Organizations," Organization Science, vol. 3, no. 3, 1992, pp. 398–427.
16. A. Van de Ven and M.S. Poole, "Alter-native Approaches for Studying Orga-ni-zational Change," Organization Studies, vol. 26, no. 9, 2005, pp. 1377–1404.