The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Subscribe
Issue No.02 - March/April (2010 vol.25)
pp: 83-88
Anita de Waard , Elsevier Labs
ABSTRACT
<p>There has been an ongoing discussion about how to improve the delivery of scientific content using online tools, especially by focusing on content reuse and social media. This column explores how semantic technologies and systems could also enhance the scientific communication process. The author discusses some ongoing initiatives in semantic publishing, which aims to improve how scientists communicate using semantic technologies. The column mentions different types of projects, including efforts focusing on entity enrichment and projects that involve triple markup of documents (subject-predicate-object expressions). However, such approaches are not enough. They help us find information, but they don't help us understand it. The author argues that we need to incorporate a better understanding of how language encodes meaning into our systems, so that we can develop a richer scientific knowledge representation.</p>
INDEX TERMS
artificial intelligence, Semantic Web, science publishing, scientific knowledge representation, entity enrichment, triples, language, semantic publishing.
CITATION
Anita de Waard, "From Proteins to Fairytales: Directions in Semantic Publishing", IEEE Intelligent Systems, vol.25, no. 2, pp. 83-88, March/April 2010, doi:10.1109/MIS.2010.49
REFERENCES
1. F.-Y. Wang, "Intelligent Systems Now," IEEE Intelligent Systems, vol. 24, no. 6, 2009, pp. 2–4.
2. M. Dzbor, J. Domingue, and E. Motta, "Magpie: Towards a Semantic Web Browser," Proc. 2nd Int'l Semantic Web Conf. (ISWC 03), LNCS 2870, Springer, 2003, pp. 690–705.
3. D. Quan and D.R. Karger, "How to Make a Semantic Web Browser," Proc. 13th Int'l Conf. World Wide Web (WWW 04), ACM Press, 2004, pp. 255–265.
4. M.R. Seringhaus and M.B. Gerstein, "Publishing Perishing? Towards Tomorrow's Information Architecture," BMC Bioinformatics, vol. 8, no. 1, 2007, p. 17.
5. A. Ceol et al., "Linking Entries in Protein Interaction Database to Structured Text: The FEBS Letters Experiment," FEBS Letters, vol. 582, no. 8, 2008, pp. 1171–1177.
6. V. Nováčcek et al., "CORAAL—Dive into Publications, Bathe in the Knowledge," to be published in J. Web Semantics, 2010.
7. D.E. Rumelhart, "Notes on a Schema for Stories," Representation and Understanding: Studies in Cognitive Science, D.G. Bobrow, and A.M. Collins eds., Academic Press, 1975, pp. 211–236.
8. J.M. Swales, , Research Genres: Explorations and Applications, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2004.
9. A. de Waard et al., "Modeling Rhetoric in Scientific Publications," Proc. Int'l Conf. Multidisciplinary Information Sciences and Technologies, Open Inst. of Knowledge, 2006, pp. 352–356.
10. R. Dawkins, The Selfish Gene, Oxford Univ. Press, 1976.
11. A. Jentzsch et al., "Enabling Tailored Therapeutics with Linked Data," Proc. Linked Data on the Web (LDOW 09), CEUR-WS.org, 2009; http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-538ldow2009_paper9.pdf .
12. M. Hall, D. Padua, and K. Pingali, "Compiler Research: The Next 50 Years," Comm. ACM, vol. 52, no. 2, 2009, pp. 60–67.
13. P. Ciccarese et al., "The SWAN Biomedical Discourse Ontology," J. Biomedical Informatics, vol. 41, no. 5, 2008, pp. 739–751.
14. S. Buckingham Shum, "Cohere: Towards Web 2.0 Argumentation," Proc. 2nd Int'l Conf. Computational Models of Argument (COMMA 08), IOS Press, 2008, pp. 97–108.
15. Á. Sándor and A. Vorndran, "Detecting Key Sentences for Automatic Assistance in Peer Reviewing Research Articles in Educational Sciences," Proc. Workshop Text and Citation Analysis for Scholarly Digital Libraries, Assoc. for Computational Linguistics, 2009, pp. 36–44.
16. Á. Sándor, "Modeling Metadiscourse Conveying the Author's Rhetorical Strategy in Biomedical Research Abstracts," Revue Française de Linguistique Appliquée, vol. 12, no. 2, 2007, pp. 97–108 (in French).
17. S. Teufel, J. Carletta, and M. Moens, "An Annotation Scheme for Discourse-Level Argumentation in Research Articles," Proc. 9th Conf. European Chapter of the Assoc. of Computational Linguistics, Assoc. of Computational Linguistics, 1999, pp. 110–117.
18. Y. Mizuta and N. Collier, "An Annotation Scheme for a Rhetorical Analysis of Biology Articles," Proc. 4th Int'l Conf. Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 04), European Language Resources Assoc., 2004, pp. 1737–1740.
19. A. de Waard et al., "Hypotheses, Evidence and Relationships: The HypER Approach for Representing Scientific Knowledge Claims," Proc. Workshop Semantic Web Applications in Scientific Discourse (SWASD 09), CEUR-WS.org, 2009; http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-523deWaard.pdf.
20. A. de Waard and G. Tel, "The ABCDE Format: Enabling Semantic Conference Proceedings," Proc. 1st Workshop Semantic Wikis: From Wiki to Semantics (SemWiki 06), CEUR-WS.org, 2006; www.ceur-ws.org/Vol-206paper8.pdf.
21. S. Das et al., "Linked Data in a Scientific Collaboration Framework," Proc. 17th Int'l World Wide Web Conf. (WWW 08), ACM Press, 2008; http://sciencecollaboration.org/sites/default/ fileswww08v4.pdf.
22. T. Groza et al., "A Short Survey of Discourse Representation Models," Proc. Workshop Semantic Web Applications in Scientific Discourse, CEUR-WS.org, 2009; http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-523Groza.pdf.
23. C. Lok, "Literature Mining: Speed Reading," Nature, vol. 463, no. 7280, 2010, pp. 416–418.
26 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool