The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Subscribe
Issue No.04 - July/August (2009 vol.24)
pp: 47-58
Marjorie McShane , University of Maryland Baltimore County
ABSTRACT
This paper presents a vision of how language-endowed, next-generation intelligent agents might resolve—that is, fully interpret—references to objects and events in language input. It describes some of the more difficult reference phenomena that are not being sufficiently treated by practical systems and suggests what kinds of knowledge must be available to intelligent agents to enable them to reach human competence in reference resolution.
INDEX TERMS
linguistics, natural language, ieee intelligent systems, human-level intelligence, ai
CITATION
Marjorie McShane, "Reference Resolution Challenges for Intelligent Agents: The Need for Knowledge", IEEE Intelligent Systems, vol.24, no. 4, pp. 47-58, July/August 2009, doi:10.1109/MIS.2009.79
REFERENCES
1. S. Nirenburg and V. Raskin, Ontological Semantics, MIT Press, 2004.
2. R. Mitkov, "Robust Pronoun Resolution with Limited Knowledge," Proc. 36th Ann. Meeting Assoc. Computational Linguistics and 17th Int'l Conf. Computational Linguistics (COLING-ACL 98), vol. 2, Assoc. for Computational Linguistics, 1998, pp. 869–875.
3. V. Ng, "Unsupervised models for coreference resolution," Proc. 2008 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-08), 2008, pp. 640-649.
4. S.P. Ponzetto and M. Strube, "Exploiting Semantic Role Labeling, WordNet and Wikipedia for Coreference Resolution," Proc. Human Language Technology Conf. North American Chapter Assoc. for Computational Linguistics (HLT-NAACL 2006), Assoc. for Computational Linguistics, 2006, pp. 192–199.
5. R. Mitkov, "Outstanding Issues in Anaphora Resolution (Invited Talk)," Proc. 2nd Int'l Conf. Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing (CICLing 01), Springer, 2001, pp. 110–125.
6. L. Hirshman and N. Chinchor, "MUC-7 Coreference Task Definition (Ver. 3.0)," Appendix F, Proc. 7th Message Understanding Conf. (MUC-7), Applications Int'l Corp., 1998; www.aclweb.org/anthology/MM98.
7. M. McShane, A Theory of Ellipsis, Oxford Univ. Press, 2005.
8. R. Evans, "Applying Machine Learning toward an Automatic Classification of It," J. Literary and Linguistic Computing, vol. 16, no. 1,Oxford Univ. Press, 2001, pp. 45–57.
9. R. Vieira and M. Poesio, "Corpus-Based Processing of Definite Descriptions," Corpus-Based and Computational Approaches to Discourse Anaphora, John Benjamins, 1997.
10. D.L. Bean and E. Riloff, "Corpus-Based Identification of Non-Anaphoric Noun Phrases," Proc. 37th Ann. Meeting Assoc. for Computational Linguistics (ACL 99), Assoc. for Computational Linguistics, 1999.
11. D. Byron, "Resolving Pronominal Reference to Abstract Entities," doctoral dissertation, tech. report 815, Dept. of Computer Science, Univ. of Rochester, 2004.
12. N. Asher and A. Lascarides, "Bridging," From Underspecification to Interpretation, R. van der Sandt, R. Blutner, and M. Bierwisch eds., , Working Papers of the Inst. for Logic and Linguistics, IBM Deutschland, 1996.
13. M. Poesio et al., "Learning to Resolve Bridging References," Proc. 42nd Ann. Meeting Assoc. for Computational Linguistics, Assoc. for Computational Linguistics, 2004.
14. M. Poesio and R. Artstein, "Annotating (Anaphoric) Ambiguity," Proc. Corpus Linguistics, 2005.
17 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool