|
| This Article | ||
| ||
| Share | ||
| Bibliographic References | ||
| Add to: | ||
 Digg  Furl  Spurl  Blink  Simpy  Google  Del.icio.us  Y!MyWeb | ||
| Search | ||
| ||
| ASCII Text | x | ||
| Dorian Gaertner, Francesca Toni, "Computing Arguments and Attacks in Assumption-Based Argumentation," IEEE Intelligent Systems, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 24-33, November/December, 2007. | |||
| BibTex | x | ||
| @article{ 10.1109/MIS.2007.105, author = {Dorian Gaertner and Francesca Toni}, title = {Computing Arguments and Attacks in Assumption-Based Argumentation}, journal ={IEEE Intelligent Systems}, volume = {22}, number = {6}, issn = {1541-1672}, year = {2007}, pages = {24-33}, doi = {http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/MIS.2007.105}, publisher = {IEEE Computer Society}, address = {Los Alamitos, CA, USA}, } | |||
| RefWorks Procite/RefMan/Endnote | x | ||
| TY - MGZN JO - IEEE Intelligent Systems TI - Computing Arguments and Attacks in Assumption-Based Argumentation IS - 6 SN - 1541-1672 SP24 EP33 EPD - 24-33 A1 - Dorian Gaertner, A1 - Francesca Toni, PY - 2007 KW - argumentation KW - implemented systems KW - dialectical structure VL - 22 JA - IEEE Intelligent Systems ER - | |||
1. P.M. Dung, "The Acceptability of Arguments and Its Fundamental Role in Non-monotonic Reasoning and Logic Programming and N-Person Game," Artificial Intelligence, vol. 77, no. 2, 1995, pp. 321–357.
2. A. Bondarenko et al., "An Abstract, Argumentation-Theoretic Framework for Default Reasoning," Artificial Intelligence, vol. 93, nos. 1–2, 1997, pp. 63–101.
3. P.M. Dung, R.A. Kowalski, and F. Toni, "Dialectic Proof Procedures for Assumption-Based, Admissible Argumentation," Artificial Intelligence, vol. 170, no. 2, 2006, pp. 114–159.
4. P.M. Dung, P. Mancarella, and F. Toni, "Computing Ideal Sceptical Argumentation," Artificial Intelligence, vol. 171, nos. 10–15, 2007, pp. 642–674.
5. D. Gaertner and F. Toni, "CaSAPI: A System for Credulous and Sceptical Argumentation," Proc. ArgNMR, LPNMR Workshop Argumentation and Non-monotonic Reasoning, 2007, pp. 80–95; http://lia.deis.unibo.it/confs/ArgNMR/proceedings ArgNMR-proceedings.pdf.
6. M. Morge and P. Mancarella, "The Hedgehog and the Fox: An Argumentation-Based Decision Support System," Proc. 4th Int'l Workshop Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems (ArgMAS 07), 2007; http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/irahwan/argmas/ argmas07argmas2007proceedings.pdf.
7. C. Reed and D. Walton, "Towards a Formal and Implemented Model of Argumentation Schemes in Agent Communication," Proc. 1st Int'l Workshop Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems (ArgMAS 04), Springer, 2004, pp. 19–30; http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/irahwan/argmas/ argmas04/papers08.pdf.
8. H. Prakken and G. Sartor, "On the Relation between Legal Language and Legal Argument: Assumptions, Applicability and Dynamic Priorities," Proc. 5th Int'l Conf. Artificial Intelligence and the Law (ICAIL95), ACM Press, 1995, pp. 1–10.
9. D. Gaertner and F. Toni, "Conflict-Free Normative Agents Using Assumption-Based Argumentation," Proc. 4th Int'l Workshop Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems (ArgMAS 07), 2007; http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/irahwan/argmas/ argmas07argmas2007proceedings.pdf.
10. N. Demetriou and A.C. Kakas, "Argumentation with Abduction," Proc. 4th Panhellenic Symp. Logic, 2003.
11. M. Caminada et al., "Implementations of Argument-Based Inference," Rev. of Argumentation Technology, 2004, pp. 2–13.
12. A. Garcia and G. Simari, "Defeasible Logic Programming: An Argumentative Approach," J. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming, vol. 4, nos. 1–2, 2004, pp. 95–138.
13. D. Bryant and P. Krause, "An Implementation of a Lightweight Argumentation Engine for Agent Applications," Logics in Artificial Intelligence: Proc. 10th European Conf. (JELIA06), LNAI 4160, Springer, 2006, pp. 469–472.