This Article 
   
 Share 
   
 Bibliographic References 
   
 Add to: 
 
Digg
Furl
Spurl
Blink
Simpy
Google
Del.icio.us
Y!MyWeb
 
 Search 
   
Prospects for a Kantian Machine
July/August 2006 (vol. 21 no. 4)
pp. 46-51
Thomas M. Powers, University of Delaware
Rule-based ethical theories like Kant's appear to be promising for machine ethics because of the computational structure of their judgments. Kant's categorical imperative is a procedure for mapping action plans (maxims) onto traditional deontic categories--forbidden, permissible, obligatory--by a simple consistency test on the maxim. This test alone, however, would be trivial. We might enhance it by adding a declarative set of "buttressing" rules. The ethical judgment is then an outcome of the consistency test, in light of the supplied rules. While this kind of test can generate nontrivial results, it might do no more than reflect the prejudices of the builder of the declarative set; the machine will "reason" straightforwardly, but not intelligently. A more promising (though speculative) option would be to build a machine with the power of nonmonotonic inference. But this option too faces formal challenges. The author discusses these challenges to a rule-based machine ethics, starting from a Kantian framework. This article is part of a special issue on Machine Ethics.
Index Terms:
machine ethics, rules, nonmonotonic reasoning, commonsense reasoning
Citation:
Thomas M. Powers, "Prospects for a Kantian Machine," IEEE Intelligent Systems, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 46-51, July-Aug. 2006, doi:10.1109/MIS.2006.77
Usage of this product signifies your acceptance of the Terms of Use.