|
| This Article | ||
| ||
| Share | ||
| Bibliographic References | ||
| Add to: | ||
| | ||
| Search | ||
| ||
| ASCII Text | x | ||
| Justin E. Harlow, "Overview of Popular Benchmark Sets," IEEE Design & Test of Computers, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 15-17, July-September, 2000. | |||
| BibTex | x | ||
| @article{ 10.1109/54.867889, author = {Justin E. Harlow}, title = {Overview of Popular Benchmark Sets}, journal ={IEEE Design & Test of Computers}, volume = {17}, number = {3}, issn = {0740-7475}, year = {2000}, pages = {15-17}, doi = {http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/54.867889}, publisher = {IEEE Computer Society}, address = {Los Alamitos, CA, USA}, } | |||
| RefWorks Procite/RefMan/Endnote | x | ||
| TY - MGZN JO - IEEE Design & Test of Computers TI - Overview of Popular Benchmark Sets IS - 3 SN - 0740-7475 SP15 EP17 EPD - 15-17 A1 - Justin E. Harlow, PY - 2000 VL - 17 JA - IEEE Design & Test of Computers ER - | |||
DOI Bookmark: http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/54.867889
One of the most difficult tasks CAD users face is the evaluation and comparison of different tools and algorithms. For commercial software purchasers, it is vital to understand how well a given tool does the required job and which of many possible choices is best for the kinds of problems a user will face. For the tool developer, whether in academia or industry, the efficiency of critical algorithms must be measured and compared to understand both tool behavior and progress over time.
Citation:
Justin E. Harlow, "Overview of Popular Benchmark Sets," IEEE Design & Test of Computers, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 15-17, July-Sept. 2000, doi:10.1109/54.867889
Usage of this product signifies your acceptance of the Terms of Use.

