This Article 
   
 Share 
   
 Bibliographic References 
   
 Add to: 
 
Digg
Furl
Spurl
Blink
Simpy
Google
Del.icio.us
Y!MyWeb
 
 Search 
   
Progress in Design for Test: A Personal View
January/March 1994 (vol. 11 no. 1)
pp. 53-59

The author discusses the history and benefits of design for test. He describes common arguments against it and gives convincing rebuttals to each. In addition, he provides a glimpse into the future of DFT. The problem is that we do not have a measurable parameter that expresses the incremental gain in product quality arising from the addition of some specific DFT technique, compared to its cost of implementation. The author refers to this parameter as the quality improvement factor (Quif), and defines it as the benefit versus the cost of the DFT technique.

Citation:
R.G. (Ben) Bennitts, "Progress in Design for Test: A Personal View," IEEE Design & Test of Computers, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 53-59, Jan.-March 1994, doi:10.1109/54.262322
Usage of this product signifies your acceptance of the Terms of Use.