The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Issue No.05 - Sept.-Oct. (2013 vol.15)
pp: 32-40
Claire Monteleoni , George Washington University
Gavin A. Schmidt , NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies
Scott McQuade , George Washington University
Given the impact of climate change, understanding the climate system is an international priority. The goal of climate informatics is to inspire collaboration between climate scientists and data scientists, in order to develop tools to analyze complex and ever-growing amounts of observed and simulated climate data, and thereby bridge the gap between data and understanding. Here, recent climate informatics work is presented, along with details of some of the remaining challenges.
Atmospheric measurements, Machine learning, Meteorology, Climate change, Informatics,climate science, machine learning, climate informatics, data mining, statistics
Claire Monteleoni, Gavin A. Schmidt, Scott McQuade, "Climate Informatics: Accelerating Discovering in Climate Science with Machine Learning", Computing in Science & Engineering, vol.15, no. 5, pp. 32-40, Sept.-Oct. 2013, doi:10.1109/MCSE.2013.50
1. C. Monteleoni et al., “Tracking Climate Models,” Statistical Analysis and Data Mining, vol. 4, no. 4, 2011, pp. 372-392.
2. C. Monteleoni et al., “Climate Informatics,” Computational Intelligent Data Analysis for Sustainable Development; Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery Series, CRC Press, 2013, pp. 81-126.
3. S. McQuade and C. Monteleoni,“Global Climate Model Tracking Using Geospatial Neighborhoods,” Proc. 26th AAAI Conf. Artificial Intelligence, AAAI, 2012, pp. 335-341.
4. G.A. Schmidt et al., “Present Day Atmospheric Simulations Using GISS ModelE: Comparison to In-Situ, Satellite and Reanalysis Data,” J. Climate, 2006, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 153-192.
5. S. Solomon et al., Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2007.
6. T. Reichler and J. Kim,“How Well Do Coupled Models Simulate Today’s Climate?,” Bull. Am. Meteorological Soc., vol. 89, no. 3, 2008, pp. 303-311;
7. C. Reifen and R. Toumi., “Climate Projections: Past Performance No Guarantee of Future Skill?” Geophysical Research Letters, vol. 36, no. 13, 2009; doi:10.1029/2009GL038082.
8. R. Knutti et al., Expert Meeting on Assessing and Combining Multi Model Climate Projections: Good Practice Guidance Paper on Assessing and Combining Multi Model Climate Projections, meeting report, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), 2010; .
9. C. Monteleoni,S. Saroha,, and G. Schmidt,“Can Machine Learning Techniques Improve Forecasts?” Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Expert Meeting on Assessing and Combining Multi-Model Climate Projections, presentation, IPCC, 2010.
10. C. Monteleoni and T. Jaakkola,“Online Learning of Non-Stationary Sequences,” Proc. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2003; NIPS2003_LT04.pdf.
11. N. Littlestone and M.K. Warmuth,“The Weighted Majority Algorithm,” Proc. IEEE Symp. Foundations of Computer Science, IEEE CS, 1989, pp. 256-261.
12. M. Herbster and M.K. Warmuth,“Tracking the Best Expert,” Machine Learning, vol. 32, no. 2, 1998, pp.151-178.
13. M. Ghafarianzadeh and C. Monteleoni,“Climate Prediction via Matrix Completion,” Proc. 27th Conf. Artificial Intelligence, Late-Breaking Papers Track, AAAI, 2013, pp. 35-37.
14. C. Tebaldi and R. Knutti,“The Use of the Multi-Model Ensemble in Probabilistic Climate Projections in Probabilistic Climate Projections,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Soc. A, vol. 365, no. 1857, 2007, pp. 2053-2075.
15. V.M. Krasnopolsky and M.S. Fox-Rabinovitz,“Complex Hybrid Models Combining Deterministic and Machine Learning Components for Numerical Climate Modeling and Weather Prediction,” Neural Networks, vol. 19, no. 2, 2006, pp. 122-134; doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2006.01.002.
16. G.A. Schmidt,A. LeGrande,, and G. Hoffmann,“Water Isotope Expressions of Intrinsic and Forced Variability in a Coupled Ocean-Atmosphere Model,” J. Geophysical Research, vol. 112, no. D10, 2007; doi:10.1029/2006JD007781.
17. G. Evensen,“Sequential Data Assimilation with a Nonlinear Quasi-Geostrophic Model Using Monte Carlo Methods to Forecast Error Statistics,” J. Geophysical Research-All Series, vol. 99, no. C5, 1994, pp. 10143-10162.
18. N.S. Keenlyside et al., “Advancing Decadal-Scale Climate Prediction in the North Atlantic Sector,” Nature, vol. 453, no. 7191, 2008, pp. 84-88.
19. D.M. Smith et al., “Improved Surface Temperature Prediction for the Coming Decade from a Global Climate Model,” Science, vol. 317, no. 5839, 2007, pp. 769-799.
20. G.A. Meehl et al., “Global Climate Projections,” Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis, tech. report, S. Solomon et al., eds., Cambridge Univ. Press, 2007; ench10.html.
21. R. Knutti et al., “Constraining Climate Sensitivity from the Seasonal Cycle in Surface Temperature,” J. Climate, vol. 19, no. 17, 2007, pp. 4224-4233.
22. J.M. Murphy et al., “A Methodology for Probabilistic Predictions of Regional Climate Change from Perturbed Physics Ensembles,” Philosophical Trans. Royal Soc. A, vol. 365, no. 1857, 2007, pp. 1993-2028.
91 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool