The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Issue No.04 - July-Aug. (2013 vol.15)
pp: 10-18
Manish Parashar , Rutgers University
Moustafa AbdelBaky , Rutgers University
Ivan Rodero , Rutgers University
Aditya Devarakonda , Rutgers University
Clouds are rapidly joining high-performance computing (HPC) systems, clusters, and grids as viable platforms for scientific exploration and discovery. As a result, understanding application formulations and usage modes that are meaningful in such a hybrid infrastructure, and how application workflows can effectively utilize it, is critical. Here, three hybrid HPC/grid and cloud cyber infrastructure usage modes are explored: HPC in the Cloud, HPC plus Cloud, and HPC as a Service, presenting illustrative scenarios in each case and outlining benefits, limitations, and research challenges.
Cloud computing, Metasearch, High performance computing, Computer architecture,HPC, cloud computing, high-performance computing, ensemble applications, infrastructure-as-a-service, hybrid infrastructure, cloud federation, scientific computing
Manish Parashar, Moustafa AbdelBaky, Ivan Rodero, Aditya Devarakonda, "Cloud Paradigms and Practices for Computational and Data-Enabled Science and Engineering", Computing in Science & Engineering, vol.15, no. 4, pp. 10-18, July-Aug. 2013, doi:10.1109/MCSE.2013.49
1. P. Mell and T. Grance, The NIST Definition of Cloud Computing, Nat'l Inst. Standards and Technology (NIST) special publication, vol. 800, 2011.
2. M. Parashar et al., “Cloud Paradigm and Practices for CDS&E,” Cloud and Autonomic Computing Center Research Report, Rutgers Univ., 2012.
3. M. AbdelBaky et al., “Enabling High-Performance Computing as a Service,” Computer, vol. 45, no. 10, 2012, pp. 72-80.
4. H. Kim and M. Parashar, “CometCloud: An Autonomic Cloud Engine,” Cloud Computing: Principles and Paradigms, Wiley, ch. 10, 2011, pp. 275-297.
5. S.I. Aanonsen et al., “The Ensemble Kalman Filter in Reservoir Engineering—A Review,” SPIE J., vol. 14, no. 3, 2009, pp. 393-412; doi:10.2118/117274-PA.
6. E. Deelman et al., “The Cost of Doing Science on the Cloud: The Montage Example,” Proc. 2008 ACM/IEEE Conf. Supercomputing, IEEE, 2008, pp. 1-12.
7. C. Evangelinos and C. Hill, “Cloud Computing for Parallel Scientific HPC Applications: Feasibility of Running Coupled Atmosphere-Ocean Climate Models on Amazon's EC2,” Proc. Cloud Computing and Its Applications, ACM, 2008, pp. 2-34; CloudComputing/Cloud%20Computing/ Applications/Cloud%20Computing%20and%20its%20Applications%20-%202008 Paper34-Chris-Hill.pdf .
8. K. Keahey and T. Freeman, “Science Clouds: Early Experiences in Cloud Computing for Scientific Applications,” Cloud Computing and Its Applications, ACM, 2008, pp. 825-830; Cloud%20Computing/Applications/ Cloud%20Computing%20and%20its%20Applications%20-%202008 Paper39-Kate-Keahey.pdf .
9. G. Fox and D. Gannon, Cloud Programming Paradigms for Technical Computing Applications, Proc. Cloud Futures Workshop, 2012; publicationsCloud%20Programming%20Paradigms.pdf .
10. S. Ostermann, R. Prodan, and T. Fahringer, “Extending Grids with Cloud Resource Management for Scientific Computing,” Proc. 10th IEEE/ACM Int'l Conf. Grid Computing, 2009, pp. 42-49.
11. A. Monteiro et al., “Sky Computing,” Proc. 6th Conf. Information Systems and Technologies, IEEE, 2011, pp. 1-4.
12. A. Goscinski, M. Brock, and P. Church, High-Performance Computing Clouds, Cloud Computing: Methodology, Systems and Applications, CRC Press, 2011.
55 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool