The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Subscribe
Issue No.05 - Sept.-Oct. (2012 vol.14)
pp: 10-20
Eric M. Heien , University of California, Davis
Michael Sachs , University of California, Davis
ABSTRACT
Understanding earthquake behavior is crucial for predicting earthquakes' effects. One way of understanding long-term earthquake behavior is through simulation. Virtual California is a program developed to generate ensembles of earthquakes in a specified fault system. The theory underlying the program, some recent results, and several optimizations used to improve performance are presented.
INDEX TERMS
Three dimensional displays, Earthquakes, Computational modeling, Program processors, Sientific computing, Green's function methods, Mathematical model, Predictive models, scientific computing, earthquake simulation, computational earthquake science, 3D simulation, geodynamics
CITATION
Eric M. Heien, Michael Sachs, "Understanding Long-Term Earthquake Behavior through Simulation", Computing in Science & Engineering, vol.14, no. 5, pp. 10-20, Sept.-Oct. 2012, doi:10.1109/MCSE.2012.39
REFERENCES
1. R. Chen, D. Branum, and C.J. Wills, California Geological Survey—2009 Earthquake Loss Estimation, Calif. Geological Survey, 2009; www.consrv.ca.gov/cgs/rghm/loss/Pages2009_analysis.aspx .
2. P. Rundle et al., “Virtual California: Fault Model, Frictional Parameters, Applications,” Pure and Applied Geophysics, vol. 163, no. 9, 2006, pp. 1819–1846.
3. M. Y?k?lmaz et al., “A Fault and Seismicity-Based Composite Simulation in Northern California,” Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics, vol. 18, no. 6, 2011, pp. 955–966.
4. S.N. Ward, “A Synthetic Seismicity Model for Southern California: Cycles, Probabilities, and Hazard,” J. Geophysical Research, vol. 101, no. B10, 1996, pp. 22393–22418.
5. J. Dieterich and K. Richards-Dinger, “Earthquake Recurrence in Simulated Fault Systems,” Pure and Applied Geophysics, vol. 167, no. 8, 2010, pp. 1087–1104.
6. F. Pollitz, “Epistemic Uncertainty in California-Wide Synthetic Seismicity Simulations,” Bulletin Seismological Soc. America, vol. 101, no. 5, 2011, pp. 2481–2498.
7. E.H. Field et al., The Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast, Version 2 (UCERF 2), US Geological Survey Open File Report 2007-1437, 2008; http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/20071437.
8. Y. Okada, “Internal Deformation Due to Shear and Tensile Faults in a Half-Space,” Bulletin Seismological Soc. America, vol. 82, no. 2, 1992, pp. 1018–1040.
9. H. Kanamori and D. Anderson, “Theoretical Basis of Some Empirical Relations in Seismology,” Bulletin Seismological Soc. America, vol. 65, no. 5, 1975, pp. 1073–1095.
10. D.L. Wells and K. Coppersmith, “New Empirical Relationships among Magnitude, Rupture Length, Rupture Width, Rupture Area, and Surface Displacement,” Bulletin Seismological Soc. America, vol. 84, no. 4, 1994, pp. 974–1002.
11. J. Barnes and P. Hut, “A Hierarchical O(N log N) Force-Calculation Algorithm,” Nature, vol. 324, 1986, pp. 446–449.
40 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool