|
| This Article | ||
| ||
| Share | ||
| Bibliographic References | ||
| Add to: | ||
 Digg  Furl  Spurl  Blink  Simpy  Google  Del.icio.us  Y!MyWeb | ||
| Search | ||
| ||
| ASCII Text | x | ||
| Andrew Davison, "Automated Capture of Experiment Context for Easier Reproducibility in Computational Research," Computing in Science and Engineering, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 48-56, July/August, 2012. | |||
| BibTex | x | ||
| @article{ 10.1109/MCSE.2012.41, author = {Andrew Davison}, title = {Automated Capture of Experiment Context for Easier Reproducibility in Computational Research}, journal ={Computing in Science and Engineering}, volume = {14}, number = {4}, issn = {1521-9615}, year = {2012}, pages = {48-56}, doi = {http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/MCSE.2012.41}, publisher = {IEEE Computer Society}, address = {Los Alamitos, CA, USA}, } | |||
| RefWorks Procite/RefMan/Endnote | x | ||
| TY - MGZN JO - Computing in Science and Engineering TI - Automated Capture of Experiment Context for Easier Reproducibility in Computational Research IS - 4 SN - 1521-9615 SP48 EP56 EPD - 48-56 A1 - Andrew Davison, PY - 2012 KW - Reproducibility of results KW - Software engineering KW - Context awareness KW - Scientific computing KW - Numerical analysis KW - Programming KW - Scientific computing KW - software/program verification KW - Reproducibility of results KW - Software engineering KW - Context awareness KW - Scientific computing KW - Numerical analysis KW - Programming KW - Scientific computing KW - scientific computing KW - reusable libraries KW - reusable software KW - reliability VL - 14 JA - Computing in Science and Engineering ER - | |||
1. S. Crook, H.E. Plesser, and A.P. Davison, “Lessons from the Past: Approaches for Reproducibility in Computational Neuroscience,” 20 Years of Computational Neuroscience, J.M. Bower ed., Springer-Verlag, in press.
2. M. Hucka et al., “, The Systems Biology Markup Language (SBML): A Medium for Representation and Exchange of Biochemical Network Models,” Bioinformatics, vol. 19, no. 4, 2003, pp. 524–531.
3. C. Drummond, “Replicability Is Not Reproducibility: Nor Is It Good Science,” Proc. Evaluation Methods for Machine Learning Workshop at the 26th Int'l Conf. Machine Learning, 2009; www.site.uottawa.caICML09WS/.
4. S. McConnell,Code Complete, 2nd ed., Microsoft Press, 2004.
5. G.R. Brammer et al., “Paper Mâché: Creating Dynamic Reproducible Science,” Procedia Computer Science, Elsevier, vol. 4, 2011, pp. 658–667.
6. P. Van Gorp and S. Mazanek, “SHARE: A Web Portal for Creating and Sharing Executable Research Papers,” Procedia Computer Science, Elsevier, vol. 4, 2011, pp. 589–597.
7. P.J. Guo and D. Engler, “CDE: Using System Call Interposition to Automatically Create Portable Software Packages,” Proc. 2011 Usenix Ann. Technical Conf., Usenix, 2011; www.usenix.org/events/atc11/tech/final_files GuoEngler.pdf.
8. D. Koop et al., “Bridging Workflow and Data Provenance Using Strong Links, Scientific and Statistical Database Management, LNCS 6187, Springer-Berlin, 2010, pp. 397–415.
9. P. Nowakowski et al., “The Collage Authoring Environment,” Procedia Computer Science, Elsevier, vol. 4, 2011, pp. 608–617.
10. R. Brette et al., “Simulation of Networks of Spiking Neurons: A Review of Tools and Strategies,” J. Computational Neuroscience, vol. 23, no. 3, 2007, pp. 349–398; doi:10.1007/s10827-007-0038-6.