The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Subscribe
Issue No.04 - July/August (2012 vol.14)
pp: 42-47
Patrick Vandewalle , Philips Research
ABSTRACT
In computational sciences such as image processing, publishing usually isn't enough to allow other researchers to verify results. Often, supplementary materials such as source code and measurement data are required. Yet most researchers choose not to make their code available because of the extra time required to prepare it. Are such efforts actually worthwhile, though?
INDEX TERMS
Reproducibility of results, Image processing, Research and development, Image processing, Publishing, Signal processing, Scientific computing, software reusability, Reproducibility of results, Image processing, Research and development, Image processing, Publishing, Signal processing, Scientific computing, scientific computing, image processing, reproducibility of results, scientific publishing
CITATION
Patrick Vandewalle, "Code Sharing Is Associated with Research Impact in Image Processing", Computing in Science & Engineering, vol.14, no. 4, pp. 42-47, July/August 2012, doi:10.1109/MCSE.2012.63
REFERENCES
1. M. Schwab, M. Karrenbach, and J. Claerbout, “Making Scientific Computations Reproducible,” Computing in Science & Eng., vol. 2, no. 6, 2000, pp. 61–67; http://dx.doi.org/10.11095992.881708.
2. J.B. Buckheit and D.L. Donoho, WaveLab and Reproducible Research, tech. report 474, Dept. of Statistics, Stanford Univ., 1995; http://www-stat.stanford.edu/~donoho/Reports/ 1995wavelab.pdf.
3. V. Stodden, “The Scientific Method in Practice: Reproducibility in the Computational Sciences,” MIT Sloan Research Paper Series, no. 4773–10, 2010; http://ssrn.comabstract=1550193.
4. F. Volken, J. Terrier, and P. Vandewalle, “Automatic Red-Eye Removal Based on Sclera and Skin Tone Detection,” Proc. Imaging Science and Technology 3rd European Conf. Color in Graphics, Imaging, and Vision (CGIV), Soc. for Imaging Science and Technology, 2006, pp. 359–364; http://infoscience.epfl.ch/record/63852/ filesVolkenTV06.pdf.
5. P. Vandewalle, S. Süsstrunk, and M. Vetterli, “A Frequency Domain Approach to Registration of Aliased Images with Application to Superresolution,” Eurasip J. Applied Signal Processing, Hindawi Publishing, vol. 2006, article ID 71459; doi:10.1155/ASP/2006/71459.
6. P. Vandewalle, J. Kovacevic, and M. Vetterli, “Reproducible Research in Signal Processing,” IEEE Signal Processing, vol. 26, no. 3, 2009, pp. 37–47; doi:10.1109/MSP.2009.932122.
7. N.P. Gleditsch and H. Strand, “Posting Your Data: Will You Be Scooped or Will You Be Famous?” Int'l Studies Perspectives, vol. 4, no. 1, 2003, pp. 89–97.
8. H.A. Piwowar, R.S. Day, and D.B. Fridsma, “Sharing Detailed Research Data Is Associated with Increased Citation Rate,” PLoS ONE, vol. 2, no. 3, 2007, p. e308; www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371 journal.pone.0000308.
9. E.A. Henneken and A. Accomazzi, “Linking to Data—Effect on Citation Rates in Astronomy,” Proc. Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems, Astronomical Soc. of the Pacific, 2011; http://arxiv.org/pdf1111.3618v1.pdf.
10. S. Lawrence, “Free Online Availability Substantially Increases a Paper's Impact,” Nature, vol. 411, no. 6837, 2001, p. 521; www.nature.com/nature/journal/v411/n6837/ full411521a0.html.
14 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool