The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Subscribe
Issue No.04 - July/August (2012 vol.14)
pp: 36-41
Bill Howe , University of Washington
ABSTRACT
As science becomes increasingly computational, reproducibility has become increasingly difficult, perhaps surprisingly. In many contexts, virtualization and cloud computing can mitigate the issues involved without significant overhead to the researcher, enabling the next generation of rigorous and reproducible computational science.
INDEX TERMS
Virtual machining, Cloud computing, Research and development, Reproducibility of results, Context awareness, Documentation, Information retrieval, Scientific computing, scientific computing, Virtual machining, Cloud computing, Research and development, Reproducibility of results, Context awareness, Documentation, Information retrieval, Scientific computing, reproducible results, case studies in scientific applications, services computing, information storage and retrieval, cloud computing
CITATION
Bill Howe, "Virtual Appliances, Cloud Computing, and Reproducible Research", Computing in Science & Engineering, vol.14, no. 4, pp. 36-41, July/August 2012, doi:10.1109/MCSE.2012.62
REFERENCES
1. J. Klinginsmith, M. Mahoui, and Y.M. Wu, “Towards Reproducible eScience in the Cloud,” Proc. Int'l Conf. Cloud Computing Technology and Science, IEEE CS, 2011, pp. 582–586.
2. B. Ludascher et al., “Scientific Workflow Management and the Kepler System,” Concurrency and Computation: Practice & Experience, vol. 18, no. 10, 2005, pp. 1039–1065.
3. P. Svard et al., “Evaluation of Delta Compression Techniques for Effcient Live Migration of Large Virtual Machines,” ACM Sigplan Notices, vol. 46, no. 7, 2011, pp. 111–120.
4. D.R Zerbino and E. Birney, “Velvet: Algorithms for De Novo Short Read Assembly Using De Bruijn Graphs,” Genome Research, vol. 18, no. 5, 2008, pp. 821–829.
5. B. Howe, “Cloud Economics: Visualizing AWS Prices over Time,” blog, 28 Nov. 2010; http://escience.washington.edu/blogcloud-economics-visualizing-aws-prices-over-time .
6. M. Balazinska, B. Howe, and D. Suciu, “Data Markets in the Cloud: An Opportunity for the Database Community,” Proc. Very Large Databases (PVLDB), VLDB Endowment, vol. 4, no. 12, 2011, pp. 1482–1485; www.vldb.org/pvldb/vol4p1482-balazinska.pdf .
7. J. Hamilton, “Internet Scale Storage,” Proc. Sigmod, ACM, 2011, pp. 1047–1048; http://doi.acm.org/10.11451989323.1989434 .
8. K.-K. Muniswamy-Reddy, P. Macko, and M. Seltzer, “Provenance for the Cloud,” Proc. 8th Usenix Conf. File and Storage Technologies, Usenix Assoc., 2010; http://static.usenix.org/event/fast10/tech/ full_papersmuniswamy-reddy.pdf.
9. D. Nurmi et al., “The Eucalyptus Open-Source Cloud-Computing System,” Proc. Cloud Computing and Its Applications, IEEE CS, 2008; www.cca08.org/papersPaper32-Daniel-Nurmi.pdf .
10. Office of Advanced Scientific Computing Research (ASCR), The Magellan Report on Cloud Computing for Science, tech. report, US Dept. of Energy, Dec. 2011; http://science.energy.gov/~/media/ascr/pdf/ program-documents/docsMagellan_Final_Report.pdf .
37 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool