|
| This Article | ||
| ||
| Share | ||
| Bibliographic References | ||
| Add to: | ||
 Digg  Furl  Spurl  Blink  Simpy  Google  Del.icio.us  Y!MyWeb | ||
| Search | ||
| ||
| ASCII Text | x | ||
| Victoria Stodden, Ian Mitchell, Randall LeVeque, "Reproducible Research for Scientific Computing: Tools and Strategies for Changing the Culture," Computing in Science and Engineering, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 13-17, July/August, 2012. | |||
| BibTex | x | ||
| @article{ 10.1109/MCSE.2012.38, author = {Victoria Stodden and Ian Mitchell and Randall LeVeque}, title = {Reproducible Research for Scientific Computing: Tools and Strategies for Changing the Culture}, journal ={Computing in Science and Engineering}, volume = {14}, number = {4}, issn = {1521-9615}, year = {2012}, pages = {13-17}, doi = {http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/MCSE.2012.38}, publisher = {IEEE Computer Society}, address = {Los Alamitos, CA, USA}, } | |||
| RefWorks Procite/RefMan/Endnote | x | ||
| TY - MGZN JO - Computing in Science and Engineering TI - Reproducible Research for Scientific Computing: Tools and Strategies for Changing the Culture IS - 4 SN - 1521-9615 SP13 EP17 EPD - 13-17 A1 - Victoria Stodden, A1 - Ian Mitchell, A1 - Randall LeVeque, PY - 2012 KW - Hidden Markov models KW - Research and development KW - Scientific computing KW - Computational complexity KW - Reproducibility of results KW - computational science and engineering KW - Hidden Markov models KW - Research and development KW - Scientific computing KW - Computational complexity KW - Reproducibility of results KW - scientific computing KW - reproducible research KW - data and code disclosure KW - reproducibility VL - 14 JA - Computing in Science and Engineering ER - | |||
1. J. Buckheit et al., About Wavelab, tech. report EFS-NSF-491, Dept of Statistics, Stanford Univ., 1995; http://statistics.stanford.edu/~ckirby/techreports/ NSFEFS NSF 491.pdf.
2. D. Donoho et al., “Reproducible Research in Computational Harmonic Analysis,” Computing in Science & Eng., vol. 11, no. 1, 2009, pp. 8–18.
3. Yale Law School Roundtable on Data and Code Sharing Roundtable, “Reproducible Research,” Computing in Science & Eng., vol. 12, no. 5, 2010, pp. 8–13.
4. B. Hanson, A. Sugden, and B. Alberts, “Making Data Maximally Available,” Science, vol. 331, no. 6018, 2011, p. 649; www.sciencemag.org/content/331/6018649.summary .
5. V. Stodden, The Scientific Method in Practice: Reproducibility in the Computational Sciences, MIT Sloan research paper no. 4773-10; http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3papers.cfm?abstract_id=1550193#%23 .
6. C. Tenopir et al., “Data Sharing by Scientists: Practices and Perceptions,” PLoS One, vol. 6, no. 6, 2011, e21101; doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0021101.
7. M. Nielsen, Reinventing Discovery: The Era of Networked Science, Princeton Univ. Press, 2011.
8. V. Stodden, “Trust Your Science? Open Your Data and Code,” Amstat News,1 July 2011; http://magazine.amstat.org/blog/2011/07/ 01trust-your-science/.
9. B. Matthews et al., “A Framework for Software Preservation,” Int'l J. Digital Curation, vol. 5, no. 1, 2010; http://ijdc.net/index.php/ijdc/article/view 148.