The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Subscribe
Issue No.01 - Jan.-Feb. (2012 vol.14)
pp: 40-51
Kenneth P. Esler , University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Jeongnim Kim , University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
David M. Ceperley , University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Luke Shulenburger , Carnegie Institution of Washington
ABSTRACT
<p>More accurate than mean-field methods and more scalable than quantum chemical methods, continuum quantum Monte Carlo (QMC) is an invaluable tool for predicting the properties of matter from fundamental principles. Because QMC algorithms offer multiple forms of parallelism, they're ideal candidates for acceleration in the many-core paradigm.</p>
INDEX TERMS
Component, graphics processors, Monte Carlo, physics, scientific computing
CITATION
Kenneth P. Esler, Jeongnim Kim, David M. Ceperley, Luke Shulenburger, "Accelerating Quantum Monte Carlo Simulations of Real Materials on GPU Clusters", Computing in Science & Engineering, vol.14, no. 1, pp. 40-51, Jan.-Feb. 2012, doi:10.1109/MCSE.2010.122
REFERENCES
1. Proc of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character, vol. 123, no. 792, 1929.
2. W.M.C. Foulkes et al., "Quantum Monte Carlo Simulations of Solids," Rev. Modern Physics, vol. 73, 2001, pp. 33–83.
3. K.P. Esler et al., "Quantum Monte Carlo Algorithms for Electronic Structure at the Petascale; The Endstation Project," J. Physics: Conf. Series, vol. 125, 2008, p. 012057; doi:10.1088/1742-6596/125/1/012057.
4. A.G. Anderson, W.A. Goddard, and P. Schroder, "Quantum Monte Carlo on Graphical Processing Units," Computer Physics Comm., vol. 177, no. 3, 2007, pp. 298–306.
5. I.S. Ufimtsev and T.J. Martinez, "Quantum Chemistry on Graphical Processing Units. 3. Analytical Energy Gradients, Geometry Optimization, and First Principles Molecular Dynamics," J. Chemical Theory Computation, vol. 5, no. 10, 2009, pp. 2619–2628.
6. K.P. Esler et al., "Fundamental High-Pressure Calibration from All-Electron Quantum Monte Carlo Calculations," Physical Rev. Letters, vol. 104, no. 18, 2010, p. 185702; doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.185702.
7. S. Chiesa, D.M. Ceperley, and S. Zhang, "Accurate, Efficient, and Simple Forces Computed with Quantum Monte Carlo Methods," Physical Rev. Letters, vol. 94, no. 3, 2005, p. 036404; doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.036404.
8. A. Badinski and R.J. Needs, "Total Forces in the Diffusion Monte Carlo Method with Nonlocal Pseudopotentials," Physical Rev. Letters, vol. 78, no. 3, 2008, p. 035134, doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.78.035134.
9. D. Alfé and M.J. Gillan, "Efficient Localized Basis Set for Quantum Monte Carlo Calculations on Condensed Matter," Physics Rev. B., vol. 70, no. 16, 2004, p. 1661101; doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.70.161101.
10. V. Natoli and D.M. Ceperley, "An Optimized Method for Treating Long-Range Potentials," J. Computational Physics, vol. 117, no. 1, 1995, pp. 171–178.
11. D.M. Ceperley and B.J. Alder, "Ground State of Solid Hydrogen at High Pressures," Physics Rev. B, vol. 36, no. 4, 1987, pp. 2092–2106.
12. M. Dewing and D.M. Ceperley, "Methods for Coupled Electronic-Ionic Monte Carlo," Recent Advances in Quantum Monte Carlo Methods, World Scientific, 2002, pp. 218–253.
6 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool