This Article 
   
 Share 
   
 Bibliographic References 
   
 Add to: 
 
Digg
Furl
Spurl
Blink
Simpy
Google
Del.icio.us
Y!MyWeb
 
 Search 
   
Postprocessing in Automated Grading Systems, Part 3
September/October 2009 (vol. 11 no. 5)
pp. 64-67

Postprocessing provides crucial flexibility when instructors use automated systems to assess student performance in science laboratory courses.

1. P.A. Knipp and S. Raj Chaudhury, "Postprocessing in Automated Grading Systems, Part 1," Computing in Science &Eng., vol. 11, no. 3, 2009, pp. 64–67.
2. P.A. Knipp and S. Raj Chaudhury, "Postprocessing in Automated Grading Systems, Part 2," Computing in Science &Eng., vol. 11, no. 4, 2009, pp. 82–85.
3. A.J. Greer and J.D. Bierman, "Challenge Laboratories," Physics Teacher, vol. 43, no. 8, 2005, pp. 527–529.
4. P.R. Bevington and D.K. Robinson, Data Reduction and Error Analysis, 3rd ed., McGraw-Hill, 2003.
5. J.W. Nilsson and S.A. Riedel, Electric Circuits, 8th ed., Pearson Prentice Hall, 2008.

Index Terms:
Postprocessing, automated grading systems
Citation:
Peter A. Knipp, S. Raj Chaudhury, "Postprocessing in Automated Grading Systems, Part 3," Computing in Science and Engineering, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 64-67, Sept.-Oct. 2009, doi:10.1109/MCSE.2009.138
Usage of this product signifies your acceptance of the Terms of Use.