The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Subscribe
Issue No.05 - September/October (2009 vol.11)
pp: 64-67
ABSTRACT
<p>Postprocessing provides crucial flexibility when instructors use automated systems to assess student performance in science laboratory courses.</p>
INDEX TERMS
Postprocessing, automated grading systems
CITATION
Peter A. Knipp, S. Raj Chaudhury, "Postprocessing in Automated Grading Systems, Part 3", Computing in Science & Engineering, vol.11, no. 5, pp. 64-67, September/October 2009, doi:10.1109/MCSE.2009.138
REFERENCES
1. P.A. Knipp and S. Raj Chaudhury, "Postprocessing in Automated Grading Systems, Part 1," Computing in Science &Eng., vol. 11, no. 3, 2009, pp. 64–67.
2. P.A. Knipp and S. Raj Chaudhury, "Postprocessing in Automated Grading Systems, Part 2," Computing in Science &Eng., vol. 11, no. 4, 2009, pp. 82–85.
3. A.J. Greer and J.D. Bierman, "Challenge Laboratories," Physics Teacher, vol. 43, no. 8, 2005, pp. 527–529.
4. P.R. Bevington and D.K. Robinson, Data Reduction and Error Analysis, 3rd ed., McGraw-Hill, 2003.
5. J.W. Nilsson and S.A. Riedel, Electric Circuits, 8th ed., Pearson Prentice Hall, 2008.
26 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool