The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Subscribe
Issue No.01 - January/February (2009 vol.11)
pp: 35-40
Victoria Stodden , Harvard University
ABSTRACT
As computational researchers increasingly make their results available in a reproducible way, and often outside the traditional journal publishing mechanism, questions naturally arise with regard to copyright, subsequent use and citation, and ownership rights in general. The growing number of scientists who release their research publicly face a gap in the current licensing and copyright structure, particularly on the Internet. Scientific research produces more than the final paper: The code, data structures, experimental design and parameters, documentation, and figures are all important for scholarship communication and result replication. The author proposes the reproducible research standard for scientific researchers to use for all components of their scholarship that should encourage reproducible scientific investigation through attribution, facilitate greater collaboration, and promote engagement of the larger community in scientific learning and discovery.
INDEX TERMS
copyright, reproducible research, licensing
CITATION
Victoria Stodden, "The Legal Framework for Reproducible Scientific Research: Licensing and Copyright", Computing in Science & Engineering, vol.11, no. 1, pp. 35-40, January/February 2009, doi:10.1109/MCSE.2009.19
REFERENCES
1. D. Donoho, "How to Be a Highly Cited Author in the Mathematical Sciences," in-cites, Mar. 2002; www.in-cites.com/scientistsDrDavidDonoho.html .
2. P. Vandewalle et al., "Experiences with Reproducible Research in Various Facets of Signal Processing Research," Proc. IEEE Conf. Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, vol. 4, 2007, pp. 1253–1256.
3. E. von Hippel, Democratizing Innovation, MIT Press, 2005, p. 85.
4. Division of Science Resources Statistics, "Survey of Research and Development Expenditures at Universities and Colleges, FY 2006," US Nat'l Science Foundation, Sept. 2007; www.nsf.gov/statistics/infbriefnsf07336.
5. "Grant General Conditions (GC-1) #38—Sharing of Findings, Data, and Other Research Products," US Nat'l Science Foundation, 1 June 2007; www.nsf.gov/pubs/policydocsgc1_607.pdf.
6. J. Buckheit and D. Donoho, Wavelab and Reproducible Research, tech. report, Dept. of Statistics, Stanford Univ., 1995.
7. R. LeVeque, "Wave Propagation Software, Computational Science, and Reproducible Research," Proc. Int'l Congress Mathematicians, M Sanz-Sole et al., eds., Aug.22–30, 2006, p. 1227–1254
8. V. Stodden, Licensing in Scientific Research, Stanford Law School, Nov. 2007.
9. R. Gentleman, and D. Lang, "Statistical Analyses and Reproducible Research," J. Computational &Graphical Statistics, vol. 16, no. 1, 2007, p. 1–23.
10. Feist Publications, Inc., v. Rural Telephone Service Company, 499 U.S. 340, 1991, pp. 363–364.
11. M. Bitton, "A New Outlook on the Economic Dimension of the Database Protection Debate," IDEA: The Intellectual Property Rev., vol. 47, June 2006, p. 93.
12. H. Abelson et al., "ccREL: The Creative Commons Rights Expression Language," Mar. 2008; http://wiki.creativecommons.org/images/d/ d6Ccrel-1.0.pdf.
16 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool