The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Issue No.01 - January/February (2009 vol.11)
pp: 8-18
Arian Maleki , Stanford University
Inam Ur Rahman , Apple Computer
Morteza Shahram , Stanford University
Victoria Stodden , Harvard University
Scientific computation is emerging as absolutely central to the scientific method. Unfortunately, it's error-prone and currently immature—traditional scientific publication is incapable of finding and rooting out errors in scientific computation—which must be recognized as a crisis. An important recent development and a necessary response to the crisis is reproducible computational research in which researchers publish the article along with the full computational environment that produces the results. The authors have practiced reproducible computational research for 15 years and have integrated it with their scientific research and with doctoral and postdoctoral education. In this article, they review their approach and how it has evolved over time, discussing the arguments for and against working reproducibly.
reproducible research, scientific computing, computational science, scientific publication
Arian Maleki, Inam Ur Rahman, Morteza Shahram, Victoria Stodden, "Reproducible Research in Computational Harmonic Analysis", Computing in Science & Engineering, vol.11, no. 1, pp. 8-18, January/February 2009, doi:10.1109/MCSE.2009.15
1. J.P.A. Ioannidis, "Why Most Published Research Findings are False," PLoS Medicine, vol. 2, no. 8, 2005, pp. 696–701.
2. J. Buckheit and D.L. Donoho, "Wavelab and Reproducible Research," Wavelets and Statistics, A. Antoniadis ed., Springer-Verlag, 1995, pp. 55–81.
3. E. Arias-Castro et al., , "Connect the Dots: How Many Random Points Can a Regular Curve Pass Through?," Advances in Applied Probability, vol. 37, no. 3, 2005, pp. 571–603.
4. S. Mallat A Wavelet Tour of Signal Processing, 2nd ed., Academic Press, 1999.
5. A. Graps, "An Introduction to Wavelets," IEEE Computational Sciences &Eng., vol. 2, no. 2, 1995, pp. 50–61.
6. D.L. Donoho and X. Huo, "Uncertainty Principles and Ideal Atomic Decomposition," IEEE Trans. Information Theory, vol. 47, no. 7, 2001, pp. 2845–2862.
7. D.L. Donoho, "For Most Large Underdetermined Systems of Linear Equations the Minimal l1-Norm Solution Is also the Sparsest Solution," Comm. Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 59, no. 6, 2006, pp. 797–829.
8. D.L. Donoho, "Compressed Sensing," IEEE Trans. Information Theory, vol. 52, no. 4, 2006, pp. 1289–1306.
9. D.L. Donoho and Y. Tsaig, "Extensions of Compressed Sensing," Signal Processing, vol. 86, no. 3, 2006, pp. 549–571.
10. V. Stodden, Model Selection When the Number of Variables Exceeds the Number of Observations, doctoral dissertation, Dept. Statistics, Stanford Univ., 2006.
11. I. Rahman et al., "Multiscale Representations for Manifold-Valued Data," SIAM Multiscale Modelling and Simulation, vol. 4, no. 4, 2005, pp. 1201–1232.
12. I. Rahman, Multiscale Decomposition of Manifold-Valued Data, doctoral dissertation, Scientific Computing and Computational Math Program, Stanford Univ., 2006.
13. M. Shahram, D.L. Donoho, and J.L. Stark, "Multiscale Representation for Data on the Sphere and Applications to Geopotential Data," Proc. SPIE Ann. Meeting, SPIE Press, 2007, pp. 67010a1–67010a11.
22 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool