The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Subscribe
Issue No.06 - November/December (2007 vol.9)
pp: 35-44
Larry P. Davis , US Department of Defense
Roy L. Campbell Jr. , US Army Research Laboratory
William A. Ward Jr. , US Army Engineer Research and Development Center
Cray J. Henry , US Department of Defense
ABSTRACT
The US Department of Defense High Performance Computing Modernization Program has developed an evaluation process that combines qualitative usability factors with quantitative performance and price-per-performance factors to determine which HPC systems to acquire in its annual modernization process.
INDEX TERMS
high-performance computing, HPC, purchase decisions, cost-benefit analysis
CITATION
Larry P. Davis, Roy L. Campbell Jr., William A. Ward Jr., Cray J. Henry, "High-Performance Computing Acquisitions Based on the Factors that Matter", Computing in Science & Engineering, vol.9, no. 6, pp. 35-44, November/December 2007, doi:10.1109/MCSE.2007.115
REFERENCES
1. F.J. Heemstra and R.J. Kusters, "Assessing IT-Investments: Costs, Benefits, Risks," Proc. Combined 11th European Software Control and Metrics Conf., Shaker Publishing, 2000, pp. 307–316.
2. C.J. Bacon, "The Use of Decision Criteria in Selecting Information Systems/Technology Investments," MIS Quarterly, vol. 16, no. 3, 1992, pp. 335–353.
3. J.J. Dujmovic, "A Method for Evaluation and Selection of Complex Hardware and Software Systems," Proc. Int'l Computer Measurement Group Conf., Computer Measurement Group, 1996, pp. 368–378.
4. S. Rosen, Lectures on the Measurement and Evaluation of the Performance of Computing Systems, CBMS-NSF Regional Conf. Series in Applied Mathematics, SIAM Press, 1976.
5. C. Jesshope, "Never Mind the Flops," Evaluating Supercomputers: Strategies for Evaluating and Benchmarking Computers with Advanced Architectures, A. van der Steen, ed., Chapman and Hall, 1990, pp. 34–43.
6. D. Ferrari, "Workload Characterization and Selection in Computer Performance Measurement," Computer, vol. 5, no. 4, 1972, pp. 18–24.
7. R.W. Alter et al., Development of the TI-01 Application Benchmark, tech. report ERDC/ITL TR-04-4, US Army Eng. Research and Development Ctr., 2004.
8. D.A. Menasce, V.A.F. Almeida, and L.W. Dowdy, Capacity Planning and Performance Modeling: From Mainframes to Client-Server Systems, Prentice Hall, 1994.
9. P.M. Bennett et al., "CCM, CEA, and CSM-Based HPCMP Systems Assessment Using GAMESS, OOCORE, and RFCTH," Proc. HPCMP Users Group Conf. 2005, IEEE CS Press, 2005, pp. 344–348.
10. S.B. Cable et al., "CFD-Based HPCMP Systems Assessment Using AERO, AVUS, and OVERFLOW-2," Proc. HPCMP Users Group Conf. 2005, IEEE CS Press, 2005, pp. 349–355.
11. C.L. Leach et al., "CWO-Based HPCMP Systems Assessment Using HYCOM and WRF," Proc. HPCMP Users Group Conf. 2005, IEEE CS Press, 2005, pp. 356–359.
12. R.L. Campbell, Jr. and W.A. Ward, Jr., "HPCMP Guide to the Best Program Architectures Based on Application Results for TI-05," Proc. HPCMP Users Group Conf. 2005, IEEE CS Press, 2005, pp. 365–372.
13. L.C. Carrington et al., "How Well Can Simple Metrics Represent the Performance of HPC Applications?" Proc. 2005 ACM/IEEE Conf. Supercomputing, IEEE CS Press, 2005, pp. 48–60.
14. H. Stone, High-Performance Computer Architecture, Addison-Wesley, 1988.
15. L.P. Davis et al., "Making HPC System Acquisition Decisions Is an HPC Application," Proc. 2004 ACM/IEEE Conf. Supercomputing, IEEE CS Press, 2004.
29 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool