The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Subscribe
Issue No.11 - Nov. (2013 vol.46)
pp: 40-47
Cristina Seceleanu , Mälardalen University, Sweden
Ivica Crnkovic , Mälardalen University, Sweden
ABSTRACT
The world of component-based systems is as appealing as it is challenging. Components, as first-class citizens of component-based systems, serve as the main units of encapsulated functionality and also units of composition, with the intention to improve development efficiency and software quality through reusability, extensibility and analyzability of software. These benefits are obtained especially when the components are understood by means of a formally well-defined component model, amenable to effective reasoning on functional and extra-functional properties at unit- as well as system-level. In this article we present the basic concepts of component-based design, emphasizing the characteristics of different types of component compositions, which dictate particular trade-offs between the degree of assurance and design flexibility. We show that rich and semantically well-defined component models with encapsulated reasoning information enable prediction of the system behavior and in general the system functional and non-functional properties. In this way, the development process is significantly simplified. We illustrate the concept by giving a short overview of the ProCom component model that is designed for enabling predictability in the embedded and real-time systems domain.
INDEX TERMS
Computational modeling, Software engineering, Prediction methods, Software architecture, predictability, software engineering, component models, reasoning
CITATION
Cristina Seceleanu, Ivica Crnkovic, "Component Models for Reasoning", Computer, vol.46, no. 11, pp. 40-47, Nov. 2013, doi:10.1109/MC.2013.335
REFERENCES
1. L. Bass, P. Clements, and R. Kazman, Software Architecture in Practice, Addison-Wesley 1997.
2. M.D. McIlroy, “Mass Produced Software Components,” Software Engineering, Report on a Conference Sponsored by the NATO Science Committee, October 1968, P. Naur, and B. Randell eds., Scientific Affairs Division, NATO, 1969, pp. 138-155; http://cm.bell-labs.com/cm/cs/who/dougcomponents.txt .
3. J. Hatcliff et al., “Behavioral Interface Specification Languages,” ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 44, no. 3, 2012, article 16.
4. S. Sentilles et al., “A Component Model for Control–Intensive Distributed Embedded Systems,” Proc. 11th Int'l Symp. Component Based Software Engineering (CBSE 2008), LNCS 5282, Springer, 2008, pp. 310-317.
5. S. Sentilles, “Managing Extra-Functional Properties in Component-Based Development of Embedded Systems,” doctoral dissertation, IDT, Mälardalen Univ., Sweden, June 2012.
6. C. Seceleanu, A. Vulgarakis, and P. Pettersson, “REMES: A Resource Model for Embedded Systems,” Proc. 14th IEEE Int'l Conf. Eng. of Complex Computer Systems (ICECCS 2009), IEEE CS, 2009, pp. 84-94.
7. J. Carlson, “Timing Analysis of Component-Based Embedded Systems,” Proc. 15th Int'l ACM SIGSOFT Symp. Component Based Software Eng., ACM, 2012, pp. 151-156.
8. I. Crnkovic et al., “Classification Framework for Software Component Models,” IEEE Trans. Software Eng., vol. 37, no. 5, 2011, pp. 593-615.
9. K.-K. Lau and W. Zheng, “Software Component Models,” IEEE Trans. Software Eng., vol. 33, no. 10, 2007, pp. 709-724.
32 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool