The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Issue No.09 - September (2013 vol.46)
pp: 38-43
Kylie Peppler , Indiana University Bloomington
Incorporating novel, cross-disciplinary technologies such as e-textiles in computing education can broaden participation, particularly by women, and improve learning outcomes.
Computer science education, Education, Textile industry, Art, Gender issues, Wearable computing,LilyPad, wearable computing, e-textiles, STEM, STEAM, computing education, gender and computing, women in computing, computing design, Arduino
Kylie Peppler, "STEAM-Powered Computing Education: Using E-Textiles to Integrate the Arts and STEM", Computer, vol.46, no. 9, pp. 38-43, September 2013, doi:10.1109/MC.2013.257
1. J. Margolis and A. Fisher,Unlocking the Clubhouse: Women in Computing, MIT Press, 2003.
2. L. Buechley and B.M. Hill,“LilyPad in the Wild: How Hardware’s Long Tail Is Supporting New Engineering and Design Communities,” Proc. 8th ACM Conf. Designing Interactive Systems (DIS 10), ACM, 2010, pp. 199-207.
3. L. Buechley et al., eds., Textile Messages: Dispatches from the World of E-Textiles and Education, Peter Lang Publishing, 2013.
4. G. Ngai et al., “Designing i*CATch: A Multipurpose, Education-Friendly Construction Kit for Physical and Wearable Computing,” ACM Trans. Computing Education, vol. 13, no. 2, 2013; doi:10.1145/2483710.2483712.
5. E. Baafi and A. Millner,“Modkit: A Toolkit for Tinkering with Tangibles & Connecting Communities,” Proc. 5th Int’l Conf. Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (TEI 11), ACM, 2011, pp. 349-352.
6. M. Resnick et al., “Scratch: Programming for All,” Comm. ACM, vol. 52, no. 11, 2009, pp. 60-67.
7. K.A. Peppler,“Media Arts: Arts Education for a Digital Age,” Teachers College Record, vol. 112, no. 8, 2011, pp. 2118-2153.
8. Y. Kafai and K. Peppler,“Rethinking Transparency in Critical Making with E-textiles,” to appear in M. Boler, and M. Ratto, eds., DIY Citizenship, MIT Press, 2013.
9. K. Peppler, and D. Glosson,“Stitching Circuits: Learning about Circuitry through E-textile Materials,” J. Science and Educational Technology, Nov. 2012; doi:10.1007/s10956-012-9428-2.
10. R. Osborne,“Towards Modifying Children’s Ideas about Electric Current,” Research in Science and Technological Education, vol. 1, no. 1, 1983, pp. 73-82.
11. N. Fredette and J. Lochhead,“Students’ Conceptions of Simple Circuits,” The Physics Teacher, vol. 18, no. 3, 1980, pp. 194-198.
12. M. Resnick and B. Silverman,“Some Reflections on Designing Construction Kits for Kids,” Proc. 2005 Conf. Interaction Design and Children (IDC 05), ACM, 2005, pp. 117-122.
13. M. Carroll et al., “Destination, Imagination and the Fires Within: Design Thinking in a Middle School Classroom,” Int’l J. Art & Design Education, vol. 29, no. 1, 2010, pp. 37-53.
14. S. Papert,Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas, Basic Books, 1980.
15. J. Qi and L. Buechley,“Electronic Popables: Exploring Paper-Based Computing through an Interactive Pop-up Book,” Proc. 4th Int’l Conf. Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (TEI 10), ACM, 2010, pp. 121-128.
16. S. Johnson and A.P. Thomas,“Squishy Circuits: A Tangible Medium for Electronics Education,” CHI ’10 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA 10), 2010, ACM, pp. 4099-4104.
54 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool