The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Subscribe
Issue No.01 - January (2000 vol.33)
pp: 54-62
ABSTRACT
<p>Although the Web itself might truthfully claim a sovereign disinterested and unbiased attitude toward the people who use it, the authors of this article claim that search engines, the tools that navigate the astronomical number of pages (800 million and counting), favor popular, wealthy, and powerful sites at the expense of others. </p> <p>Some researchers have estimated that, taken individually, none of the Web search engines studied indexes more than 16 percent of the total indexable Web. Combined, the results from all search engines they studied covered only about 42 percent of the Web. </p> <p>But what about those portions of the Web that remain hidden from view? This article looks at how search engine developers, designers, and producers grapple with the technical limits that restrict what their engines can find. The authors also examine influences that may determine systematic inclusion and exclusion of certain sites, and the wide-ranging factors that dictate systematic prominence for some sites while relegating others to systematic invisibility. </p>
CITATION
Lucas Introna, Helen Nissenbaum, "Defining the Web: The Politics of Search Engines", Computer, vol.33, no. 1, pp. 54-62, January 2000, doi:10.1109/2.816269
REFERENCES
1. S. Lawrence and C.L. Giles, "Accessibility of Information on the Web," Nature, No. 400, 1999, pp. 107-109.
2. L. Winner, "Do Artifacts Have Politics," Daedalus, No. 109, 1980, pp. 121-136.
3. V. Phua, "Towards a Set of Ethical Rules for Search Engines," MSc dissertation, London School of Eco nomics, London, 1998.
4. J. Cho, H. Garcia-Molina, and L. Page, "Efficient Crawling through URL Ordering," Proc. 7th WWW Conf., 1998; .
5. B. Friedman and H. Nissenbaum, "Bias in Computer Systems," ACM Trans. Information Systems, Vol. 14, No. 3, July 1996, pp. 330-347.
6. G. Pringle, L. Allison, and D.L. Dowe, "What Is a Tall Poppy among Web Pages?" Proc. 7th Int'l World Wide Web Conf., 1998, .
7. A. Sen, "The Moral Standing of the Market," Social Philosophy&Policy, Vol. 2, No. 2, Spring 1985, pp. 1-19.
8. E. Anderson, Value in Ethics and Economics, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass. and London, 1993.
9. D.R. Johnson and D. Post, "Law and Borders—The Rise of Law in Cyberspace," Stanford Law Review, Vol. 48, No. 5, 1996.
10. D. Kellner, "Intellectuals, the New Public Spheres, and Techno-Politics," www7.scu.edu.au/programme/fullpapers/1919/ com1919.htmhttp://www7.scu.edu.au/programme/ fullpapers/1872/com1872.htmhttp:/ /www.gseis.ucla.edu/courses/ed253a/newDK intell.htm.
11. J. van den Hoven, "Towards Ethical Principles for Designing Politico-Administrative Information Systems," Informatization and the Public Sector (now Information Infrastructure and Policy), Vol. 3, 1994, pp. 353-373.
12. R. Civille, "The Internet and the Poor," Public Access to the Internet, B. Kahin and J. Keller, eds., MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1996.
13. D.L. Hoffman and T.P. Novak, "Bridging the Racial Divide on the Internet," Science, Vol. 280, Apr.17 1998, pp. 390-391.
14. L. Lessig, "The Law of the Horse: What Cyberlaw Might Teach," Harvard Law Review, to appear.
15. A. Sen, On Ethics and Economics,Blackwell, Oxford, UK, 1987.
14 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool