The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Subscribe
Issue No.06 - Nov.-Dec. (2013 vol.33)
pp: 26-34
Matt Ratto , Univ. of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
ABSTRACT
As a result of consumer-level 3D printers' increasing availability and affordability, the audience for 3D-design tools has grown considerably. However, current tools are ill-suited for these users. They have steep learning curves and don't take into account that the end goal is a physical object, not a digital model. A new class of "maker"-level design tools is needed to accompany this new commodity hardware. However, recent examples of such tools achieve accessibility primarily by constraining functionality. In contrast, the meshmixer project is building tools that provide accessibility and expressive power by leveraging recent computer graphics research in geometry processing. The project members have had positive experiences with several 3D-design-to-print workshops and are exploring several design-to-fabricate problems. This article is part of a special issue on 3D printing.
INDEX TERMS
Three dimensional displays, Design methodology, Printers, Software development, Economics, Fabrication,meshmixer, 3D printing, computer graphics, maker-level design
CITATION
Ryan Schmidt, Matt Ratto, "Design-to-Fabricate: Maker Hardware Requires Maker Software", IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, vol.33, no. 6, pp. 26-34, Nov.-Dec. 2013, doi:10.1109/MCG.2013.90
REFERENCES
1. N. Umetani, T. Igarashi, and N. Mitra, “Guided Exploration of Physically Valid Shapes for Furniture Design,” ACM Trans. Graphics, vol. 31, no. 4, 2012, article 86; www-ui.is.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~ume/GuidedExploration 2012_siggraph_GuidedExploration.html .
2. A. Rivers, A. Adams, and F. Durand, “Sculpting by Numbers,” ACM Trans. Graphics, vol. 31, no. 6, 2012, article 157; www.alecrivers.comsculptingbynumbers.
3. R. Schmidt and K. Singh, Drag, Drop, and Clone: An Interactive Interface for Surface Composition, tech. report CSRG-611, Dept. of Computer Science, Univ. of Toronto, 2010.
4. R. Prévost et al., “Make It Stand: Balancing Shapes for 3D Fabrication,” ACM Trans. Graphics, vol. 32, no. 4, 2013, article 81; http://igl.ethz.ch/projectsmake-it-stand .
5. Q. Zhou, J. Panetta, and D. Zorin, “Worst-Case Structural Analysis,” ACM Trans. Graphics, vol. 32, no. 4, 2013, article 137; www.cs.nyu.edu/~qnzhou/projectsStructAys .
6. O. Stava et al., “Stress Relief: Improving Structural Strength of 3D Printable Objects,” ACM Trans. Graphics, vol. 31, no. 4, 2012, article 48; http://hpcg.purdue.edu?page=publication&id=164 .
114 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool