The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Subscribe
Issue No.04 - July-Aug. (2013 vol.33)
pp: 82-87
ABSTRACT
The emerging field of game user research (GUR) investigates interaction between players and games and the surrounding context of play. Game user researchers have explored methods from, for example, human-computer interaction, psychology, interaction design, media studies, and the social sciences. They've extended and modified these methods for different types of digital games, such as social games, casual games, and serious games. This article describes several current GUR methods. A case study illustrates two specific methods: think-aloud and heuristics.
INDEX TERMS
Games, Human computer interaction, User interfaces, Researach and development, Context awareness, Testing, Heuristic algorithms,A/B testing, game user research, computer games, human-computer interaction, software development, computer graphics, think-aloud, Rapid Iterative Testing and Evaluation, RITE, heuristics, playtesting, game usability, game playability
CITATION
Heather Desurvire, M. S. El-Nasr, "Methods for Game User Research: Studying Player Behavior to Enhance Game Design", IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, vol.33, no. 4, pp. 82-87, July-Aug. 2013, doi:10.1109/MCG.2013.61
REFERENCES
1. S.E. Siwerk, Video Games in the 21st Century, Entertainment Software Assoc., 2010; www.theesa.com/facts/pdfs/VideoGames21stCentury_2010.pdf.
2. M. Seif El-Nasr et al., “Game Analytics for Game User Research, Part 1: A Workshop Review and Case Study,” IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, vol. 33, no. 2, 2013 pp. 6-11.
3. C.H. Lewis, Using the “Thinking Aloud” Method in Cognitive Interface Design, tech. report RC 9265, IBM, 1982.
4. P.C. Wright and A. Monk, “The Use of Think-Aloud Evaluation Methods in Design,” ACM SIGCHI Bull., vol. 23, no. 1, 1991 pp. 55-57.
5. J. Nielsen, “Heuristic Evaluation,” Usability Inspection Methods, J. Nielsen and R.L. Mack, eds., John Wiley & Sons, 1994 pp. 25-62.
6. H. Desurvire, M. Caplan, and J.A. Toth, “Using Heuristics to Evaluate the Playability of Games,” CHI ‘04 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 2004 pp. 1509-1512.
7. H. Desurvire and C. Wiberg, “Game Usability Heuristics (PLAY) for Evaluating and Designing Better Games: The Next Iteration,” Proc. 3rd Int'l Conf. Online Communities and Social Computing (OCSC 09), Springer, 2009 pp. 557-566.
8. H. Desurvire and C. Wiberg, “Master of the Game: Assessing Approachability in Future Game Design,” CHI ‘08 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 2008 pp. 3177-3182.
9. J. Gee, What Video Games Have to Teach Us about Learning and Literacy, Palgrave Macmillan, 2003.
10. M. Ambinder, “Biofeedback in Gameplay: How Valve Measures Physiology to Enhance Gaming Experience,” presentation at 2011 Game Developers Conf., 2011; www.valvesoftware.com/publications/2011/ValveBiofeedback-Ambinder.pdf.
19 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool