The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Subscribe
Issue No.02 - March-April (2013 vol.33)
pp: 47-55
Gang Ren , Univ. of Bath, Bath, UK
Chuan Li , Univ. of Bath, Bath, UK
E. O'Neill , Univ. of Bath, Bath, UK
P. Willis , Univ. of Bath, Bath, UK
ABSTRACT
Users increasingly expect more-interactive experiences with public displays for applications including learning, gaming, urban visualization, and planning. However, user interaction with applications on public displays is challenging and often doesn't lend itself to established interaction techniques. Navigation using only freehand gestures captured with low-cost devices might often be an appropriate solution. A formal, quantitative lab experiment and an informal, qualitative field study compared freehand gestural interaction with keyboard-and-mouse interaction. No significant difference in navigation performance existed between the two interaction types. However, gestural interaction provided a more natural experience in both personal and public environments.
INDEX TERMS
Navigation, Displays, Interactive systems, Visualization, Games, User interfaces, Cities and towns, Gesture recognition, Human computer interaction, Three dimensional displays, Haptic interfaces, Urban areas,input devices, Navigation, Displays, Interactive systems, Visualization, Games, User interfaces, Cities and towns, Gesture recognition, Human computer interaction, Three dimensional displays, Haptic interfaces, Urban areas, human-computer interaction, Navigation, Displays, Interactive systems, Visualization, Games, User interfaces, Cities and towns, Gesture recognition, Human computer interaction, Three dimensional displays, Haptic interfaces, Urban areas, computer graphics, freehand gestures, interaction with public displays, 3D navigation, user interfaces
CITATION
Gang Ren, Chuan Li, E. O'Neill, P. Willis, "3D Freehand Gestural Navigation for Interactive Public Displays", IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, vol.33, no. 2, pp. 47-55, March-April 2013, doi:10.1109/MCG.2013.15
REFERENCES
1. H. Benko, “Beyond Flat Surface Computing: Challenges of Depth-Aware and Curved Interfaces,” Proc. 17th ACM Int'l Conf. Multimedia (MM 09), ACM, 2009, pp. 935–944.
2. M. Doulis et al., “SpaceActor—Interface Prototypes for Virtual Environments,” Proc. 2006 IEEE Symp. 3D User Interfaces (3DUI 06), IEEE, 2006, pp. 171–174.
3. L. Deligiannidis and J. Larkin, “Navigating Inexpensively and Wirelessly,” Proc. Conf. Human System Interactions, IEEE, 2008, pp. 165–169.
4. N. Bakker, P. Werkhoven, and P. Passenier, “Aiding Orientation Performance in Virtual Environments with Proprioceptive Feedback,” Proc. 1998 IEEE Ann. Int'l Symp. Virtual Reality (VR 98), IEEE, 1998, pp. 28–33.
5. R. Kopper et al., “Design and Evaluation of Navigation Techniques for Multiscale Virtual Environments,” Proc. 2006 IEEE Ann. Int'l Symp. Virtual Reality (VR 06), IEEE, 2006, pp. 175–182.
6. U. Hinrichs and S. Carpendale, “Gestures in the Wild: Studying Multi-touch Gesture Sequences on Interactive Tabletop Exhibits,” Proc. 2011 SIGCHI Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 11), ACM, 2011, pp. 3023–3032.
43 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool