The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Subscribe
Issue No.02 - March-April (2013 vol.33)
pp: 16-24
ABSTRACT
Interactive tabletops and surfaces (ITSs) provide rich opportunities for data visualization and analysis and consequently are used increasingly in such settings. A research agenda of some of the most pressing challenges related to visualization on ITSs emerged from discussions with researchers and practitioners in human-computer interaction, computer-supported collaborative work, and a variety of visualization fields at the 2011 Workshop on Data Exploration for Interactive Surfaces (Dexis 2011).
INDEX TERMS
Data visualization, Interactive systems, Computer graphics, User interfaces,multitouch, Data visualization, Interactive systems, Computer graphics, User interfaces, computer graphics, visualization, interactive surfaces, display technology
CITATION
P. Isenberg, T. Isenberg, T. Hesselmann, Bongshin Lee, U. von Zadow, A. Tang, "Data Visualization on Interactive Surfaces: A Research Agenda", IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, vol.33, no. 2, pp. 16-24, March-April 2013, doi:10.1109/MCG.2013.24
REFERENCES
1. K. Kin, M. Agrawala, and T. DeRose,“Determining the Benefits of Direct-Touch, Bimanual, and Multifinger Input on a Multitouch Workstation,” Proc. Graphics Interface 2009, Canadian Information Processing Soc., 2009, pp. 119–124.
2. P. Isenberg and D. Fisher, “Collaborative Brushing and Linking for Co-located Visual Analytics of Document Collections,” Computer Graphics Forum, vol. 28, no. 3, 2009, pp. 1031–1038.
3. G. Robles-De-La-Torre,“The Importance of the Sense of Touch in Virtual and Real Environments,” IEEE MultiMedia, vol. 13, no. 3, 2006, pp. 24–30.
4. D.F. Keefe, “Integrating Visualization and Interaction Research to Improve Scientific Workflows,” IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, vol. 30, no. 2, 2010, pp. 8–13.
5. B. Lee et al., “Beyond Mouse and Keyboard: Expanding Design Considerations for Information Visualization Interactions,” IEEE Trans. Visualization and Computer Graphics, vol. 18, no. 12, 2012, pp. 2689–2698.
6. C. Andrews et al., “Information Visualization on Large, High-Resolution Displays: Issues, Challenges, and Opportunities,” Information Visualization, vol. 10, no. 4, 2011, pp. 341–355.
7. D. Wigdor et al., “WeSpace: The Design Development and Deployment of a Walk-Up and Share Multi-surface Visual Collaboration System,” Proc. 2009 Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 09), ACM, 2009, pp. 1237–1246.
8. P. Isenberg et al., “Digital Tables for Collaborative Information Exploration,” Tabletops—Horizontal Interactive Displays, C. Müller-Tomfelde ed., Springer, 2010, pp. 387–405.
9. J.R. Wallace et al., “Investigating the Role of a Large, Shared Display in Multi-display Environments,” Computer Supported Cooperative Work, vol. 20, no. 6, 2011, pp. 529–561.
10. A. Bezerianos, and P. Isenberg, “Perception of Visual Variables on Tiled Wall-Sized Displays for Information Visualization Applications,” IEEE Trans. Visualization and Computer Graphics, vol. 18, no. 12, 2012, pp. 2516–2525.
11. M. Stone, “In Color Perception, Size Matters,” IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, vol. 32, no. 2, 2012, pp. 8–13.
12. M. Frisch, J. Heydekorn, and R. Dachselt, “Investigating Multi-touch and Pen Gestures for Diagram Editing on Interactive Surfaces,” Proc. 2009 ACM Int'l Conf. Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces (ITS 09), ACM, 2009, pp. 149–156.
13. D. Valkov et al., “2D Touching of 3D Stereoscopic Objects,” Proc. 2011 Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 11), ACM, 2011, pp. 1353–1362.
14. P. Isenberg et al., eds., Proc. Workshop Data Exploration on Interactive Surfaces (Dexis 11), research report RR-0421, INRIA, May 2012; http://hal.inria.frhal-00659469.
24 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool