The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Subscribe
Issue No.02 - March/April (2010 vol.30)
pp: 8-13
Daniel F. Keefe , University of Minnesota, Twin Cities
ABSTRACT
Visualization research and interaction research have been connected for some time, and there's a growing trend toward integrating the two. Four examples illustrate the potential and challenges of this integration: 3D selection techniques in brain visualizations, interactive multiview scientific visualizations, fluid pen- and touch-based interfaces for visualization, and modeling human performance in interactive visualization-related tasks. Three goals (improving accuracy, linking multiple visualization strategies, and making data analysis more "fluid") serve as a guide for future interactive-visualization research targeted at improving visualization tools' impact on scientific workflows.
INDEX TERMS
scientific visualization, human-computer interaction, 3D selection, multiview visualization, fluid interface, steering law, computer graphics, graphics and multimedia
CITATION
Daniel F. Keefe, "Integrating Visualization and Interaction Research to Improve Scientific Workflows", IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, vol.30, no. 2, pp. 8-13, March/April 2010, doi:10.1109/MCG.2010.30
REFERENCES
1. B. Shneiderman, "The Eyes Have It: A Task by Data Type Taxonomy for Information Visualizations," Proc. 1996 IEEE Symp. Visual Languages, IEEE CS Press, 1996, p. 336.
2. C. North, "Toward Measuring Visualization Insight," IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, vol. 26, no. 3, 2006, pp. 6–9.
3. D. Akers, "Cinch: A Cooperatively Designed Marking Interface for 3D Pathway Selection," Proc. ACM Symp. User Interface Software and Technology, ACM Press, 2006, pp. 33–42.
4. D.F. Keefe, R.C. Zeleznik, and D.H. Laidlaw, "Tech-note: Dynamic Dragging for Input of 3D Trajectories," Proc. 2008 IEEE Symp. 3D User Interfaces, IEEE Press, 2008, pp. 51–54.
5. H. Piringer, R. Kosara, and H. Hauser, "Interactive Focus+Context Visualization with Linked 2D/3D Scatterplots," Proc. 2nd Int'l Conf. Coordinated & Multiple Views in Exploratory Visualization (CMV 04), IEEE CS Press, 2004, pp. 49–60.
6. D.F. Keefe et al., "Interactive Coordinated Multiple-View Visualization of Biomechanical Motion Data," IEEE Trans. Visualization and Computer Graphics, vol. 15, no. 6, 2009, pp. 1383–1390.
7. T. Isenberg et al., "Interactive Exploratory Visualization of 2D Vector Fields," Computer Graphics Forum, vol. 27, no. 3, 2008, pp. 983–990.
8. T. Isenberg, U. Hinrichs, and S. Carpendale, "Studying Direct-Touch Interaction for 2D Flow Visualization," Proc. VisWeek Workshop Collaborative Visualization on Interactive Surfaces (CoVIS 09), 2009; www.cs.rug.nl/~isenberg/personal/papersIsenberg_2009_SDT.pdf .
9. P. Fitts, "The Information Capacity of the Human Motor System in Controlling the Amplitude of Movement," J. Experimental Psychology, vol. 47, 1954, pp. 381–391.
10. J. Accot and S. Zhai, "Beyond Fitts' Law: Models for Trajectory-Based HCI Tasks," Proc. 1997 SIGCHI Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 97), ACM Press, 1997, pp. 295–302.
11. D.F. Keefe, "Interactive 3D Drawing for Free-Form Modeling in Scientific Visualization and Art: Tools, Methodologies, and Theoretical Foundations," PhD dissertation, Dept. of Computer Science, Brown Univ., 2007; http://vis.cs.brown.edu/docs/pdfKeefe-2007-I3D.pdf .
6 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool