The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Subscribe
Issue No.05 - September/October (2009 vol.29)
pp: 44-57
Petra Isenberg , University of Calgary, Calgary
Anastasia Bezerianos , Ecole Paris Central, Paris
Nathalie Henry , Microsoft Research, Redmond
Sheelagh Carpendale , University of Calgary, Calgary
Jean-Daniel Fekete , INRIA, Orsay
ABSTRACT
Collaboration is one way to deal with the increasing amount and complexity of information available to analysts. However, most information visualization systems incorporate little or no specific support for collaboration. Reimplementing existing applications to fully incorporate our current understanding of computer-supported cooperative work could be exhausting, time consuming, and expensive. To aid this process, the authors explored how to cost-effectively create a colocated collaborative information visualization and analysis environment. They extended NodeTrix, a social-network-analysis tool, to enable multiuser interaction in collaborative environments, and performed a user study assessing the retrofitted system's usability. Their results verify the low-cost retrofitting's effectiveness and highlight implications for practitioners. This article is part of a special issue on collaborative visualization.
INDEX TERMS
colocated collaboration, social-network analysis, network visualization, collaborative information visualization, computer graphics
CITATION
Petra Isenberg, Anastasia Bezerianos, Nathalie Henry, Sheelagh Carpendale, Jean-Daniel Fekete, "CoCoNutTrix: Collaborative Retrofitting for Information Visualization", IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, vol.29, no. 5, pp. 44-57, September/October 2009, doi:10.1109/MCG.2009.78
REFERENCES
1. N. Henry, J.-D. Fekete, and M.J. McGuffin, "NodeTrix: A Hybrid Visualization of Social Networks," IEEE Trans. Visualization and Computer Graphics, vol. 13, no. 6, 2007, pp. 1302–1309.
2. P. Isenberg and S. Carpendale, "Interactive Tree Comparison for Co-located Collaborative Information Visualization," IEEE Trans. Visualization and Computer Graphics, vol. 12, no. 5, 2007, pp. 1232–1239.
3. E. Tse et al., "Avoiding Interference: How People Use Spatial Separation and Partitioning in SDG Workspaces," Proc. 2004 ACM Conf. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW 04), ACM Press, 2004, pp. 252–261.
4. A. Noack, "Energy-Based Clustering of Graphs with Nonuniform Degrees," Proc. 13th Int'l Symp. Graph Drawing (GD 05), Springer, 2005, pp. 309–320.
5. S. Wassermann and K. Faust, Social Network Analysis, Cambridge Univ. Press, 1994.
6. C. Gutwin and S. Greenberg, "The Mechanics of Collaboration: Developing Low Cost Usability Evaluation Methods for Shared Workspaces," Proc. IEEE 9th Int'l Workshops Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises (WETICE 00), IEEE CS Press, 2000, pp. 98–103.
7. P. Baudisch, E. Cutrell, and G. Robertson, "High-Density Cursor: A Visualization Technique That Helps Users Keep Track of Fast-Moving Mouse Cursors," Proc. Interact '03, IOS Press, 2003, pp. 236–243.
8. M.R. Morris et al., "Beyond Social Protocols: Multi-user Coordination Policies for Co-located Groupware," Proc. 2004 ACM Conf. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW 04), ACM Press, 2004, pp. 262–265.
9. P. Isenberg, A. Tang, and S. Carpendale, "An Exploratory Study of Visual Information Analysis," Proc. 26th Ann. SIGCHI Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 08), ACM Press, 2008, pp. 1217–1226.
10. A. Tang et al., "Collaborative Coupling over Tabletop Displays," Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 06), ACM Press, 2006, pp. 1181–1190.
11. G. Stahl, Group Cognition, MIT Press, 2006.
18 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool