The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Subscribe
Issue No.04 - July/August (2009 vol.29)
pp: 86-91
David W. Sprague , University of Victoria
Melanie Tory , University of Victoria
ABSTRACT
Guiding principles behind casual information visualization (InfoVis) design appear torn between maintaining current visualization best practices and focusing on user motivation to get "eyes on the screen" through any means necessary. This article focuses on pragmatic casual information visualization (PCIV)—that is, systems for data analysis and exploration in which users are not guided by formal task descriptions or financial incentives. This subarea is easier to examine using empirical evaluation. To explore PCIV's balance between fun and functionality, however, requires new or less common empirical methods. After all, how important is task efficiency if people are using the system to procrastinate? PCIV has clear research commonalities with traditional InfoVis, but performance metrics alone do not adequately address research questions in this new context. Several suggestions provide an initial step in defining and refining PCIV research approaches.
INDEX TERMS
information visualization, casual InfoVis, empirical evaluation, qualitative methods, quantitative design
CITATION
David W. Sprague, Melanie Tory, "Motivation and Procrastination: Methods for Evaluating Pragmatic Casual Information Visualizations", IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, vol.29, no. 4, pp. 86-91, July/August 2009, doi:10.1109/MCG.2009.70
REFERENCES
1. Z. Pousman, J. Stasko, and M. Mateas, "Casual Information Visualization: Depictions of Data in Everyday Life," Proc. IEEE Symp. Information Visualization (InfoVis 07), IEEE Press, 2007, pp. 1145–1152.
2. R. Kosara, "Visualization Criticism—the Missing Link between Information Visualization and Art," Proc. Int'l Conf. Information Visualization (IV 07), IEEE Press, 2007, pp. 631–636.
3. M. Wattenberg, "Baby Names, Visualization, and Social Data Analysis," Proc. IEEE Symp. Information Visualization (InfoVis 05), IEEE Press, 2005, pp. 1–8.
4. U. Hinrichs, H. Schmidt, and S. Carpendale, "EMDialog: Bringing Information Visualization into the Museum," Trans. Visualization and Computer Graphics, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 1181–1188.
5. D. Sprague, F. Wu, and M. Tory, "Music Selection Using the PartyVote Democratic Jukebox," Proc. Working Conf. Advanced Visual Interfaces (AVI 08), ACM Press, 2008, pp. 433–436.
6. D. Sprague and M. Tory, "Motion in Casual InfoVis and the Interrelation between Personality, Performance, and Preference," tech. report, Dept. of Computer Science, Univ. of Victoria, 2009; http://hdl.handle.net/18281429.
7. N. Cawthon and A. Vande Moere, "The Effect of Aesthetic on the Usability of Data Visualization," Proc. IEEE Int'l Conf. Information Visualization (IV 07), IEEE Press, 2007, pp. 637–648.
8. B. Shneiderman and C. Plaisant, "Strategies for Evaluating Information Visualization Tools: Multidimensional In-Depth Long-Term Case Studies," Proc. 2006 AVI Workshop beyond Time and Errors (BELIV 06), ACM Press, 2006, pp. 1–7.
9. P. Isenberg et al., "Grounded Evaluation of Information Visualizations," Proc. 2008 Conf. beyond Time and Errors (BELIV 08), ACM Press, 2008, pp. 56–63.
10. F. Wu and M. Tory, "PhotoScope: Visualizing Spatiotemporal Coverage of Photos for Construction Management," Proc. 27th Int'l Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 09), ACM Press, 2009, pp. 1103–1112.
16 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool