The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Subscribe
Issue No.06 - November/December (1999 vol.19)
pp: 36-42
ABSTRACT
The biggest single obstacle to building effective augmented reality (AR) systems is the lack of accurate wide-area sensors for tracking the locations and orientations of objects in an environment. Active (sensor-emitter) tracking technologies require powered-device installation, limiting their use to prepared areas that are relatively free of natural or man-made interference sources. Vision-based systems can use passive landmarks, but they are more computationally demanding and often exhibit erroneous behavior due to occlusion or numerical instability. Inertial sensors are completely passive, requiring no external devices or targets, however, their drift rates in portable strapdown configurations are too great for practical use. In this paper, we present a hybrid approach to orientation tracking that integrates inertial and vision-based sensing. We exploit the complementary nature of the two technologies to compensate for the weaknesses in each component. Analysis and experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach.
CITATION
Suya You, Ulrich Neumann, Ronald Azuma, "Orientation Tracking for Outdoor Augmented Reality Registration", IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, vol.19, no. 6, pp. 36-42, November/December 1999, doi:10.1109/38.799738
REFERENCES
1. R. Azuma, "A Survey of Augmented Reality," Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, Vol. 6, No. 4, 1997, pp. 355-385.
2. U. Neumann and A. Majoros, "Cognitive, Performance, and Systems Issues for Augmented Reality Applications in Manufacturing and Maintenance," Proc. IEEE Virtual Reality Ann. Int'l Symp. (VRAIS 98), IEEE CS Press, Los Alamitos, Calif., 1998, pp. 4-11.
3. K. Meyer, H. Applewhite, and F. Biocca, "A Survey of Position Trackers," Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, vol. 1, no. 2, 1992, pp. 173-200.
4. A. State, G. Hirota, D.T. Chen, W.F. Garrett, and M.A. Livingston, “Superior Augmented Reality Registration by Integrating Landmark Tracking and Magnetic Tracking,” Proc. 23rd Int'l Conf. Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (SIGGRAPH '96), pp. 429-438, Aug. 1996.
5. R. Azuma and G. Bishop, “Improving Static and Dynamic Registration in an Optical See-Through HMD,” Computer Graphics (Proc. Siggraph), ACM Press, 1994, pp. 197-204.
6. E. Foxlin, M. Harrington, and G. Pfeifer, "Constellation: A Wide-Range Wireless Motion-Tracking System for Augmented Reality and Virtual Set Applications," Proc. Ann. Conf. Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (Proc. Siggraph 98), M.F. Cohen, ed., ACM Press, New York, 1998, pp. 371-378.
7. R. Azuma et al., "A Motion-Stabilized Outdoor Augmented Reality System," Proc. IEEE Virtual Reality, IEEE CS Press, Los Alamitos, Calif., 1999, pp. 252-259.
8. S. You, U. Neumann, and R. Azuma, Hybrid Inertial and Vision Tracking for Augmented Reality Registration Proc. IEEE Virtual Realiy Conf., pp. 260-267, Mar. 1999.
9. G. Welch, Hybrid Self-Tracker: An Inertial/Optical Hybrid Three-Dimensional Tracking System, tech. report TR95-048, Univ. of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Dept. Computer Science, Chapel Hill, N.C., 1995.
10. R.S. Suorsa and B. Sridhar, "A Parallel Implementation of a Multisensor Feature-Based Range-Estimation Model," IEEE Trans. on Robotics and Automation, Vol. 10, No. 6, 1994, pp. 155-168.
11. J. Lobo et al., "Inertial Navigation System for Mobile Land Vehicles," Proc. IEEE Int'l Symp. on Industrial Electronics (ISIE 95), IEEE Press, Piscataway, N.J., 1995, pp. 843-848.
12. U. Neumann and S. You, "Natural Feature Tracking for Augmented Reality," IEEE Trans. Multimedia, vol. 1, no. 1, Mar. 1999, pp. 53-64.
17 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool