The Community for Technology Leaders
RSS Icon
Subscribe
Issue No.06 - November-December (1998 vol.18)
pp: 53-63
ABSTRACT
This article describes work being undertaken by the multi-partner European Union-funded project Coven (Collaborative Virtual Environments). Coven is developing collaborative virtual environment (CVE) systems and technologies to support a group of travel rehearsal applications. One of the project's major themes is the evaluation of CVE applications through extensive network trials, usability evaluations, and in-depth case-controlled experiments. This article concentrates on an experimental study where groups of three strangers meet in a CVE to carry out a simple collaborative task. The experiment was designed to investigate issues about group behavior such as the relationship between emergent leadership and computational resources, presence of being in a place, and the co-presence-the sense of togetherness-amongst the participants. This experiment and others undertaken by the project highlight a number of issues involving participant representation, interaction style, and system implementation that need to be addressed in future CVE development.
INDEX TERMS
Virtual reality, collaborative virtual environments, user evaluation, small group behavior, presence
CITATION
Jolanda Tromp, Adrian Bullock, Anthony Steed, Amela Sadagic, Mel Slater, Emmanuel Frécon, "Small Group Behavior Experiments in the Coven Project", IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, vol.18, no. 6, pp. 53-63, November-December 1998, doi:10.1109/38.734980
REFERENCES
1. A. Guye-Vuilleme et al., "Nonverbal Communication Interface for Collaborative Virtual Environments," Proc. Collaborative Virtual Environments 98 (CVE 98), University of Manchester, D. Snowdon and E. Churchill, eds., June 1998, pp. 105-112.
2. E. Frécon and M. Stenius, "DIVE: A Scalable Network Architecture for Distributed Virtual Environments," to be published in the Distributed Systems Engineering Journal (special issue on Distributed Virtual Environments), Vol. 5, No. 3, Sept. 1998, pp. 91-100.
3. M. Rygol et al., "Technology for Collaborative Virtual Environments," Proc. Collaborative Virtual Environments 96 (CVE 96), University of Nottingham, September 1996.
4. V. Hardman, M-A. Sasse, and I. Kouvelas, "Successful Multiparty Audio Communication Over the Internet," Comm. ACM, Vol. 41, No. 5, May 1998, pp. 74-80.
5. National Research Council, Virtual Reality: Scientific and Technological Challenges, N.I. Durlach and A.S. Mavor, eds., National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 1995.
6. A. Steed and J.G. Tromp, "Experiences with the Evaluation of CVE Applications," Proc. Collaborative Virtual Environments 98 (CVE 98), D. Snowdon and E. Churchill, eds., University of Manchester, June, 1998, pp. 123-130.
7. E-M. Melchior et al., Handbook for Practical Usability Engineering in IE Projects, Project ELPUB 105 10107, Telematics Application program, Information Engineering section, ECSC-EC-EAEC (European Commission), Brussels-Luxembourg, 1996.
8. J. Nielsen and R.L. Mack, Usability Inspection Methods, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1994.
9. N. Durlach and M. Slater, "Presence in Shared Virtual Environments and Virtual Togetherness," Proc. BT Workshop on Presence in Shared Virtual Environments,Martlesham, UK, June 1998, http://www.cs.ucl.ac.uk/staff/m.slater/BTWorkshop durlach.html.
10. M. Slater et al., "Small Group Behavior in Virtual and Real Environments: A Comparative Study," submitted to Presence, summarized inhttp://www.cs.ucl.ac.uk/staff/m.slater/BTWorkshop Inhabit, 1998.
11. C. Heath, P. Luff, and A. Sellen, "Reconsidering the Virtual Workplace: Flexible Support for Collaborative Activity," Proc. Fourth European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (ECSCW 95), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1995, pp. 83-99.
12. T. Robertson, "Cooperative Work and Lived Cognition: A Taxonomy of Embodied Actions," Proc. Fifth European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (ECSCW 97), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1997, pp. 205-220.
20 ms
(Ver 2.0)

Marketing Automation Platform Marketing Automation Tool